Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456193›Full record

SynthesisDer Nervenarzt2016

[Utilization of outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment : A secondary data analysis].

W Gaebel, J Zielasek, S Kowitz

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Nervenarzt, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W GaebelKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. wolfgang.gaebel@uni-duesseldorf.de.
J ZielasekKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
S KowitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Center for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of a well-developed and complex mental healthcare system in Germany, problems remain in the capacity of psychotherapeutic care with an undersupply and long waiting times for provision of outpatient psychotherapeutic care.

objectivesThe analyses address the current level of psychotherapeutic care and the role of individual medical specialties in outpatient psychotherapeutic care in Germany. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe analyses are based on secondary data from three statutory health insurance companies and the German pension funds for the years 2005-2007. Anonymized treatment data from 3.3 million insured persons with a diagnosis of a mental disorder (ICD-10 groups F0-F5) were analyzed.

resultsIn outpatient treatment 9,670,588 psychotherapeutic accounting codes were analyzed of which 33 % were psychiatric, psychosomatic or psychotherapeutic consultations that are not covered by the scope of psychotherapy according to the standard regulations (psychotherapy guidelines). The most frequently used psychotherapeutic services were verbal interventions (accounting codes 35.100 and 31.110) and psychiatric consultations (accounting codes 14.220, 21.220 and 21.221), independent of the mental disorder. Of the patients 5.9 % received directive psychotherapy. The provider-specific analysis showed a great variation in the kind of accounting codes, which were brought into account by the different providers.

conclusionWith regard to the reform efforts in psychotherapeutic care, longitudinal trends in the utilization and quality of psychotherapeutic care in the individual fields of treatment should be analyzed in follow-up studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMind-Body TherapiesPrevalencePsychotherapyReferral and ConsultationUtilization ReviewMental disorderMental health services researchPsychotherapeutic careSecondary dataTherapist profile

Identifiers

PMID27456193
OpenAlexW2502041603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.