Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456004›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

A synergistic DNA logic predicts genome-wide chromatin accessibility.

Tatsunori Hashimoto, Richard I Sherwood, Daniel D Kang, Nisha Rajagopal, Amira A Barkal, Haoyang Zeng, Bart J M Emons, Sharanya Srinivasan, Tommi Jaakkola, David K Gifford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computing Leapfrog Regularization Paths with Applications to Large-Scale K-mer Logistic Regression.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Non-coding genetic variation in cancer.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Article
  13. A CRISPR view of gene regulation.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsunori HashimotoComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Richard I SherwoodDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Daniel D KangComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Nisha RajagopalComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Amira A BarkalComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Haoyang ZengComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Bart J M EmonsDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Sharanya SrinivasanComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Tommi JaakkolaComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
David K GiffordComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Transcriptional Regulation of Stem Cell Differentiation into Motor NeuronsP01NS055923 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2006 to 2010
$6.6M
SysCODE: Systems-based Consortium for Organ Design and Engineering Leadership MoUL1DE019581 · NIDCR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAAS, RICHARD L · 2008 to 2011
$4.0M
SysCODE: Tooth Germ Design and Engineering (2 of 10)RL1DE019021 · NIDCR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAAS, RICHARD L · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
High-throughput methods for elucidating the control of chromatin accessibilityR01HG008363 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2015 to 2017
$2.3M
Integrated Genome Discovery at Single Base Pair ResolutionU01HG007037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
Predictive transcription factor modeling to program endodermal cell fatesK01DK101684 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHERWOOD, RICHARD I · 2014 to 2018
$670k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008363NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007037NIDCR NIH HHS RL1 DE019021NIDCR NIH HHS UL1 DE019581NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK101684NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS055923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancers and promoters commonly occur in accessible chromatin characterized by depleted nucleosome contact; however, it is unclear how chromatin accessibility is governed. We show that log-additive cis-acting DNA sequence features can predict chromatin accessibility at high spatial resolution. We develop a new type of high-dimensional machine learning model, the Synergistic Chromatin Model (SCM), which when trained with DNase-seq data for a cell type is capable of predicting expected read counts of genome-wide chromatin accessibility at every base from DNA sequence alone, with the highest accuracy at hypersensitive sites shared across cell types. We confirm that a SCM accurately predicts chromatin accessibility for thousands of synthetic DNA sequences using a novel CRISPR-based method of highly efficient site-specific DNA library integration. SCMs are directly interpretable and reveal that a logic based on local, nonspecific synergistic effects, largely among pioneer TFs, is sufficient to predict a large fraction of cellular chromatin accessibility in a wide variety of cell types.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyModels, GeneticAnimalsChromatinGenome, HumanHumansMachine LearningChromatin

Identifiers

PMID27456004
PMCPMC5052050
OpenAlexW2496503183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.