Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27455326›Full record

ReviewToxins2016

Colubrid Venom Composition: An -Omics Perspective.

Inácio L M Junqueira-de-Azevedo, Pollyanna F Campos, Ana T C Ching, Stephen P Mackessy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evolution of ZW Sex Chromosomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Venom phenotype conservation suggests integrated specialization in a lizard-eating snake.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2023
    Article
  18. What Are the Neurotoxins in Hemotoxic Snake Venoms?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inácio L M Junqueira-de-AzevedoLaboratório Especial de Toxinologia Aplicada, Center of Toxins, Immune-Response and Cell Signaling (CeTICS), Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil. inacio.azevedo@butantan.gov.br.
Pollyanna F CamposLaboratório Especial de Toxinologia Aplicada, Center of Toxins, Immune-Response and Cell Signaling (CeTICS), Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil. pollyanna.fc@gmail.com.
Ana T C ChingLaboratório de Imunoquímica, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil. anatung@gmail.com.
Stephen P MackessySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639-0017, USA. stephen.mackessy@unco.edu.
Instituto Butantan · BRUniversity of Northern Colorado · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake venoms have been subjected to increasingly sensitive analyses for well over 100 years, but most research has been restricted to front-fanged snakes, which actually represent a relatively small proportion of extant species of advanced snakes. Because rear-fanged snakes are a diverse and distinct radiation of the advanced snakes, understanding venom composition among "colubrids" is critical to understanding the evolution of venom among snakes. Here we review the state of knowledge concerning rear-fanged snake venom composition, emphasizing those toxins for which protein or transcript sequences are available. We have also added new transcriptome-based data on venoms of three species of rear-fanged snakes. Based on this compilation, it is apparent that several components, including cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRiSPs), C-type lectins (CTLs), CTLs-like proteins and snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs), are broadly distributed among "colubrid" venoms, while others, notably three-finger toxins (3FTxs), appear nearly restricted to the Colubridae (sensu stricto). Some putative new toxins, such as snake venom matrix metalloproteinases, are in fact present in several colubrid venoms, while others are only transcribed, at lower levels. This work provides insights into the evolution of these toxin classes, but because only a small number of species have been explored, generalizations are still rather limited. It is likely that new venom protein families await discovery, particularly among those species with highly specialized diets.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsColubridaeEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationPhylogenyProtein ConformationProteomicsReptilian ProteinsSnake VenomsStructure-Activity RelationshipReptilian ProteinsSnake VenomsColubridaeevolutionproteinssnaketoxinstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27455326
PMCPMC4999846
OpenAlexW2498175383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.