Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27454794›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Policy dialogue to improve health outcomes in low income countries: what are the issues and way forward?

Juliet Nabyonga-Orem, Delanyo Dovlo, Aku Kwamie, Ade Nadege, Wang Guangya, Joses Muthuri Kirigia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.Health research policy and systems · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Shaping Policy on Chronic Diseases through National Policy Dialogs in CHRODIS PLUS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliet Nabyonga-OremHealth Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo. nabyongaj@who.int.
Delanyo DovloHealth Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo.
Aku KwamieUniversity of Ghana, School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG 13, Accra, Ghana.
Ade NadegeEngage Africa Foundation, 73 Aspen Hills Terr SW, Calgary, AB, T3H OP4, Canada.
Wang GuangyaThe London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Joses Muthuri KirigiaHealth Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper has three objectives: to review the health development landscape in the World Health Organization African Region, to discuss the role of health policy dialogue in improving harmonisation and alignment to national health policies and strategic plans, and to provide an analytical view of the critical factors in realising a good outcome from a health policy dialogue process. DISCUSSION: Strengthening policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of robust and comprehensive national health policies and plans, as well as to improve aid effectiveness, is seen as a strategic entry point to improving health sector results. However, unbalanced power relations, the lack of contextualised and relevant evidence, the diverse interests of the actors involved, and the lack of conceptual clarity on what policy dialogue entails impact the outcomes of a policy dialogue process. The critical factors for a successful policy dialogue have been identified as adequate preparation; secured time and resources to facilitate an open, inclusive and informed discussion among the stakeholders; and stakeholders' monitoring and assessment of the dialogue's activities for continued learning. Peculiarities of low income countries pose a challenge to their policy dialogue processes, including the chaotic-policy making processes, the varied capacity of the actors and donor dependence.

conclusionPolicy dialogue needs to be appreciated as a complex and iterative process that spans the whole process of policy-making, implementation, review and monitoring, and subsequent policy revisions. The existence of the critical factors for a successful policy dialogue process needs to be ensured whilst paying special attention to the peculiarities of low income countries and potential power relations, and mitigating the possible negative consequences. There is need to be cognisant of the varied capacities and interests of stakeholders and the need for capacity building, and to put in place mechanisms to manage conflict of interest. The likelihood of a favourable outcome from a policy dialogue process will depend on the characteristics of the issue under consideration and whether it is contested or not, and the policy dialogue process needs to be tailored accordingly.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PolicyPolicy MakingCapacity BuildingHealth PromotionHealth ResourcesHealthy People ProgramsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePovertyWorld Health OrganizationHealth developmentNational health policyPolicy dialogueStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID27454794
PMCPMC4959394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.