Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27454253›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2016

Approximate parameter inference in systems biology using gradient matching: a comparative evaluation.

Benn Macdonald, Mu Niu, Simon Rogers, Maurizio Filippone, Dirk Husmeier

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benn MacdonaldSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QW, Scotland. b.macdonald.research@gmail.com.
Mu NiuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QW, Scotland.
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland.
Maurizio FilipponeEURECOM, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Dirk HusmeierSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QW, Scotland.
University of Glasgow · GBEURECOM · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conventional methods that repeatedly numerically solve the ODEs have large associated computational costs. Aimed at reducing this cost, new concepts using gradient matching have been proposed, which bypass the need for numerical integration. This paper presents a recently established adaptive gradient matching approach, using Gaussian processes (GPs), combined with a parallel tempering scheme, and conducts a comparative evaluation with current state-of-the-art methods used for parameter inference in ODEs. Among these contemporary methods is a technique based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). This has previously shown promising results for parameter estimation, but under lax experimental settings. We look at a range of scenarios to test the robustness of this method. We also change the approach of inferring the penalty parameter from AIC to cross validation to improve the stability of the method.

methodsMethodology for the recently proposed adaptive gradient matching method using GPs, upon which we build our new method, is provided. Details of a competing method using RKHS are also described here.

resultsWe conduct a comparative analysis for the methods described in this paper, using two benchmark ODE systems. The analyses are repeated under different experimental settings, to observe the sensitivity of the techniques.

conclusionsOur study reveals that for known noise variance, our proposed method based on GPs and parallel tempering achieves overall the best performance. When the noise variance is unknown, the RKHS method proves to be more robust.

Indexed as

HumansLikelihood FunctionsNormal DistributionSystems BiologyGaussian processesGradient matchingOrdinary differential equationsParallel temperingParameter inferenceReproducing kernel Hilbert spaces

Identifiers

PMID27454253
PMCPMC4959362
OpenAlexW2224050399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.