Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27454226›Full record

ArticleAging2016

Loss of oxidative defense and potential blockade of satellite cell maturation in the skeletal muscle of patients with cancer but not in the healthy elderly.

Joanna Brzeszczyńska, Neil Johns, Alain Schilb, Simone Degen, Martin Degen, Ramon Langen, Annemie Schols, David J Glass, Ronenn Roubenoff, Carolyn A Greig and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03191955 (Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03191955 completednot on this map

Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2015 to 2025Enrolled282ConditionsCachexia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. CircEpigenetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Joanna BrzeszczyńskaTissue Injury and Repair Group, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Neil JohnsTissue Injury and Repair Group, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Alain SchilbNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Simone DegenNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Martin DegenNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Ramon LangenNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Annemie ScholsNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
David J GlassNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Ronenn RoubenoffNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Carolyn A GreigSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences and MRC-ARUK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Carsten JacobiNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Kenneth Ch FearonClinical Sciences (Surgery), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
James A RossTissue Injury and Repair Group, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBMaastricht University · NLMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle wasting in old age or cancer may result from failed myofiber regeneration and/or accelerated atrophy. This study aimed to determine from transcriptomic analysis of human muscle the integrity of the cellular stress response system in relation to satellite cell differentiation or apoptosis in patients with cancer (weight-stable (CWS) or weight-losing (CWL)) or healthy elderly (HE) when compared with healthy middle-aged controls (HMA). 28 patients with cancer (CWS: 18 and CWL: 10), HE: 21 and HMA: 20 underwent biopsy of quadriceps muscle. The expression of transcription factors for muscle regeneration (Pax3, Pax7 and MyoD) was increased in CWS and HE compared with HMA (p≤0.001). In contrast, the expression of the late myogenic differentiation marker MyoG was reduced in CWS and CWL but increased in HE (p≤0.0001). Bax was significantly increased in CWS, CWL and HE (p≤0.0001). Expression of the oxidative defense genes SOD2, GCLM, and Nrf2 was decreased in CWS and CWL but increased in HE (p≤0.0001). There is evidence for blockade of satellite cell maturation, upregulation of apoptosis and reduced oxidative defense in the muscle of cancer patients. In the healthy elderly the potential for differentiation and oxidative defense is maintained.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCachexiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyNeoplasmsSatellite Cells, Skeletal Musclecachexiaelderlyoxidative stresssatellite cells

Identifiers

PMID27454226
PMCPMC5032690
OpenAlexW2490137870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.