ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Network topology measures for identifying disease-gene association in breast cancer.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of proteins' expression pathway and the effective miRNAs for the treatment of human papillomavirus-induced cervical cancer: in-silico analyses-experimental research.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Network analysis of driver genes in human cancers.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Individual-network based predictions of microbial interaction signatures for response to biological therapies in IBD patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Molecular docking and MD simulation approach to identify potential phytochemical lead molecule against triple negative breast cancer.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer target identification and drug discovery.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Review
- Topological network measures for drug repositioning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Gene Targeting in Disease Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Variability of Betweenness Centrality and Its Effect on Identifying Essential Genes.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- Six novel immunoglobulin genes as biomarkers for better prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer by gene co-expression network analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Identifying pathway modules of tuberculosis in children by analyzing multiple different networks.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Graph-theoretical comparison of normal and tumor networks in identifying BRCA genes.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Protein network construction using reverse phase protein array data.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMassive biological datasets are generated in different locations all over the world. Analysis of these datasets is required in order to extract knowledge that might be helpful for biologists, physicians and pharmacists. Recently, analysis of biological networks has received a lot of attention, as an understanding of the network can reveal information about life at the cellular level. Biological networks can be generated that examine the interaction between proteins or the relationship amongst different genes at the expression level. Identifying information from biological networks is recognized as a significant challenge, due to the inherent complexity of the structures. Computational techniques are used to analyze such complex networks with varying success.
resultsIn this paper, we construct a new method for predicting phenotype-gene association in breast cancer using biological network analysis. Several network topological measures have been computed and fed as features into two classification models to investigate phenotype-gene association in breast cancer. More importantly, to overcome the problem of the skewed datasets, a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is adapted in order to transform an imbalanced dataset to a balanced one. We have applied our method on the gene co-expression network (GCN), protein-protein interaction network (PPI), and the integrated functional interaction network (FI), which combined the PPIs and gene co-expression, amongst others. We assess the quality of our proposed method using a slightly modified cross-validation.
conclusionsOur method can identify phenotype-gene association in breast cancer. Moreover, use of the integrated functional interaction network (FI) has the potential to reveal more information and hidden patterns than the other networks. The software and accompanying examples are freely available at http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/ics/eramadan/NetTop.zip .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.