Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453984›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Global Forum 2015 dialogue on "From evidence to policy - thinking outside the box": perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region.

Joses Muthuri Kirigia, Charles Ok Pannenborg, Luis Gabriel Cuervo Amore, Hassen Ghannem, Carel IJsselmuiden, Juliet Nabyonga-Orem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joses Muthuri KirigiaHealth Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, B. P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo. muthurijoses@yahoo.com.
Charles Ok PannenborgThe World Bank, Washington, D.C, USA.
Luis Gabriel Cuervo AmoreResearch Promotion and Development, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, D.C, USA.
Hassen GhannemDepartment of Epidemiology, University Hospital Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunis, Tunisia.
Carel IJsselmuidenCouncil on Health Research for Development (COHRED), Geneva, Switzerland.
Juliet Nabyonga-OremHealth Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, B. P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CGCouncil on Health Research for Development · CHHôpital Farhat Hached · TNWorld Bank · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Forum 2015 panel session dialogue entitled "From evidence to policy - thinking outside the box" was held on 26 August 2015 in the Philippines to debate why evidence was not fully translated into policy and practice and what could be done to increase its uptake. This paper reports the reasons and possible actions for increasing the uptake of evidence, and highlights the actions partners could take to increase the use of evidence in the African Region. DISCUSSION: The Global Forum 2015 debate attributed African Region's low uptake of evidence to the big gap in incentives and interests between research for health researchers and public health policy-makers; limited appreciation on the side of researchers that public health decisions are based on multiple and complex considerations; perception among users that research evidence is not relevant to local contexts; absence of knowledge translation platforms; sub-optimal collaboration and engagement between industry and research institutions; lack of involvement of civil society organizations; lack of engagement of communities in the research process; failure to engage the media; limited awareness and debate in national and local parliaments on the importance of investing in research and innovation; and dearth of research and innovation parks in the African Region.

conclusionThe actions needed in the Region to increase the uptake of evidence in policy and practice include strengthening NHRS governance; bridging the motivation gap between researchers and health policy-makers; restoring trust between researchers and decision-makers; ensuring close and continuous intellectual intercourse among researchers, ministry of health policy-makers and technocrats during the life course of research projects or programmes; proactive collaboration between academia and industry; regular briefings of civil society, media, relevant parliamentary committees and development partners; development of vibrant knowledge translation platforms; development of action plans for implementing research recommendations, preferably in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals; and encouragement of competition on NHRS strengthening and research output and uptake among the countries using a barometer or scorecard to review their performance at various regional ministerial forums and taking into account the lessons learned from the MDG period.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationHealth PolicyAfricaEvidence-Based PracticeGlobal HealthGoalsGovernment ProgramsHealth Services ResearchHealthy People ProgramsHumansInterprofessional RelationsMotivationPolicy MakingResearch PersonnelTranslational Research, BiomedicalDiffusion of innovationKnowledge translationMDGs and SDGsNational health research systemsSupport of research

Identifiers

PMID27453984
PMCPMC4959371
OpenAlexW2478597571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.