Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453937›Full record

ReviewScience advances2016

Why marine phytoplankton calcify.

Fanny M Monteiro, Lennart T Bach, Colin Brownlee, Paul Bown, Rosalind E M Rickaby, Alex J Poulton, Toby Tyrrell, Luc Beaufort, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Samantha Gibbs and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Genome ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Dynamic Inhibition of Calcite Dissolution in Flowing Acidic PbEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fanny M MonteiroSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8790-0188
Lennart T BachGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0202-3671
Colin BrownleeMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK.
Paul BownDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-4463
Rosalind E M RickabyDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6095-8419
Alex J PoultonOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5149-6961
Toby TyrrellOcean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Luc BeaufortAix-Marseille University/CNRS, Centre Européen de Recherche et d'Enseignement des Géosciences de l'Environnement (CEREGE), 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France.
Stephanie DutkiewiczDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-9679
Samantha GibbsOcean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Magdalena A GutowskaMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Road, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA.
Renee LeeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK.
Ulf RiebesellGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Jeremy YoungMuseum of Natural History, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Andy RidgwellSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.; Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-0128

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcifying marine phytoplankton-coccolithophores- are some of the most successful yet enigmatic organisms in the ocean and are at risk from global change. To better understand how they will be affected, we need to know "why" coccolithophores calcify. We review coccolithophorid evolutionary history and cell biology as well as insights from recent experiments to provide a critical assessment of the costs and benefits of calcification. We conclude that calcification has high energy demands and that coccolithophores might have calcified initially to reduce grazing pressure but that additional benefits such as protection from photodamage and viral/bacterial attack further explain their high diversity and broad spectrum ecology. The cost-benefit aspect of these traits is illustrated by novel ecosystem modeling, although conclusive observations remain limited. In the future ocean, the trade-off between changing ecological and physiological costs of calcification and their benefits will ultimately decide how this important group is affected by ocean acidification and global warming.

Indexed as

Calcification, PhysiologicCalcium CarbonateEcosystemGlobal WarmingHaptophytaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOceans and SeasPhotosynthesisSeawaterCalcium CarbonatecalcificationCoccolithophoresecological and physiological costs and benefitsecosystem modelingphotosynthesistrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID27453937
PMCPMC4956192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.