Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453729›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

High-level expression of thermostable cellulolytic enzymes in tobacco transplastomic plants and their use in hydrolysis of an industrially pretreated Arundo donax L. biomass.

Daniela Castiglia, Lorenza Sannino, Loredana Marcolongo, Elena Ionata, Rachele Tamburino, Angelo De Stradis, Beatrice Cobucci-Ponzano, Marco Moracci, Francesco La Cara, Nunzia Scotti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Plastid Transformation: New Challenges in the Circular Economy Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela CastigliaCNR-IBBR UOS Portici, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Portici, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, NA Italy.
Lorenza SanninoCNR-IBBR UOS Portici, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Portici, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, NA Italy.
Loredana MarcolongoCNR-IBBR UOS Naples, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy ; CNR-IBAF UOS Napoli, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Agro-environmental and Forest Biology, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy.
Elena IonataCNR-IBBR UOS Naples, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy ; CNR-IBAF UOS Napoli, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Agro-environmental and Forest Biology, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy.
Rachele TamburinoCNR-IBBR UOS Portici, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Portici, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, NA Italy.
Angelo De StradisCNR-IPSP UOS Bari, National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Research Division Bari, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Beatrice Cobucci-PonzanoCNR-IBBR UOS Naples, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy.
Marco MoracciCNR-IBBR UOS Naples, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy.
Francesco La CaraCNR-IBBR UOS Naples, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy ; CNR-IBAF UOS Napoli, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Agro-environmental and Forest Biology, Research Division Naples, Via P. Castellino 111, Naples, Italy.
Nunzia ScottiCNR-IBBR UOS Portici, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Research Division Portici, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici, NA Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7792-5955
Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofuels production from plant biomasses is a complex multi-step process with important economic burdens. Several biotechnological approaches have been pursued to reduce biofuels production costs. The aim of the present study was to explore the production in tobacco plastome of three genes encoding (hemi)cellulolytic enzymes from thermophilic and hyperthermophilic bacterium and Archaea, respectively, and test their application in the bioconversion of an important industrially pretreated biomass feedstock (A. donax) for production of second-generation biofuels.

resultsThe selected enzymes, endoglucanase, endo-β-1,4-xylanase and β-glucosidase, were expressed in tobacco plastome with a protein yield range from 2 % to more than 75 % of total soluble proteins (TSP). The accumulation of endoglucanase (up to 2 % TSP) gave altered plant phenotypes whose severity was directly linked to the enzyme yield. The most severe seedling-lethal phenotype was due to the impairment of plastid development associated to the binding of endoglucanase protein to thylakoids. Endo-β-1,4-xylanase and β-glucosidase, produced at very high level without detrimental effects on plant development, were enriched (fourfold) by heat treatment (105.4 and 255.4 U/mg, respectively). Both plastid-derived biocatalysts retained the main features of the native or recombinantly expressed enzymes with interesting differences. Plastid-derived xylanase and β-glucosidase resulted more thermophilic than the E. coli recombinant and native counterpart, respectively. Bioconversion experiments, carried out at 50 and 60 °C, demonstrated that plastid-derived enzymes were able to hydrolyse an industrially pretreated giant reed biomass. In particular, the replacement of commercial enzyme with plastid-derived xylanase, at 60 °C, produced an increase of both xylose recovery and hydrolysis rate; whereas the replacement of both xylanase and β-glucosidase produced glucose levels similar to those observed with the commercial cocktails, and xylose yields always higher in the whole 24-72 h range.

conclusionsThe very high production level of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic enzymes, their stability and bioconversion efficiencies described in this study demonstrate that plastid transformation represents a real cost-effective production platform for cellulolytic enzymes.

Indexed as

BioconversionGreen factory(Hemi)cellulolytic enzymesIndustrially pretreated plant biomassPlastid transformation

Identifiers

PMID27453729
PMCPMC4957871
OpenAlexW2478858920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.