Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453700›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG

Prediction of Warfarin Dose in Pediatric Patients: An Evaluation of the Predictive Performance of Several Models.

Elizabeth Marek, Jeremiah D Momper, Ronald N Hines, Cheryl M Takao, Joan C Gill, Vera Pravica, Andrea Gaedigk, Gilbert J Burckart, Kathleen A Neville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Stability of warfarin sodium flavoured preservative-free oral liquid formulations.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth MarekDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeremiah D MomperSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Ronald N HinesDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, City, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Cheryl M TakaoDivision of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Joan C GillDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, City, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Vera PravicaInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Andrea GaedigkDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, and School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Gilbert J BurckartPediatric Clinical Pharmacology Staff, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Kathleen A NevilleSection of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Funding

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008562 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER K KRAFT, Scott A. Waldman · 1995 to 2026
$10.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of pediatric pharmacogenetic-based dose prediction models by using an independent cohort of pediatric patients from a multicenter trial.

methodsClinical and genetic data (CYP2C9 [cytochrome P450 2C9] and VKORC1 [vitamin K epoxide reductase]) were collected from pediatric patients aged 3 months to 17 years who were receiving warfarin as part of standard care at 3 separate clinical sites. The accuracy of 8 previously published pediatric pharmacogenetic-based dose models was evaluated in the validation cohort by comparing predicted maintenance doses to actual stable warfarin doses. The predictive ability was assessed by using the proportion of variance (R(2)), mean prediction error (MPE), and the percentage of predictions that fell within 20% of the actual maintenance dose.

resultsThirty-two children reached a stable international normalized ratio and were included in the validation cohort. The pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dose models showed a proportion of variance ranging from 35% to 78% and an MPE ranging from -2.67 to 0.85 mg/day in the validation cohort. Overall, the model developed by Hamberg et al showed the best performance in the validation cohort (R(2) = 78%; MPE = 0.15 mg/day) with 38% of the predictions falling within 20% of observed doses.

conclusionsPharmacogenetic-based algorithms provide better predictions than a fixed-dose approach, although an optimal dose algorithm has not yet been developed.

Indexed as

childrenpediatricspharmacogeneticswarfarin

Identifiers

PMID27453700
PMCPMC4956330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.