Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453679›Full record

ArticleCritical reviews in environmental science and technology2016

Nonoxidative removal of organics in the activated sludge process.

Oskar Modin, Frank Persson, Britt-Marie Wilén, Malte Hermansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oskar ModinDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Frank PerssonDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Britt-Marie WilénDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Malte HermanssonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Gothenburg University , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activated sludge process is commonly used to treat wastewater by aerobic oxidation of organic pollutants into carbon dioxide and water. However, several nonoxidative mechanisms can also contribute to removal of organics. Sorption onto activated sludge can remove a large fraction of the colloidal and particulate wastewater organics. Intracellular storage of, e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), triacylglycerides (TAG), or wax esters can convert wastewater organics into precursors for high-value products. Recently, several environmental, economic, and technological drivers have stimulated research on nonoxidative removal of organics for wastewater treatment. In this paper, we review these nonoxidative removal mechanisms as well as the existing and emerging process configurations that make use of them for wastewater treatment. Better utilization of nonoxidative processes in activated sludge could reduce the wasteful aerobic oxidation of organic compounds and lead to more resource-efficient wastewater treatment plants.

Indexed as

Adsorptioncolloidscontact-stabilizationDLVO theoryhigh-rate activated sludgepolyhydroxyalkanoatetriacylglyceride

Identifiers

PMID27453679
PMCPMC4940897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.