Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27453079›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2016

Combined Stimulant and Guanfacine Administration in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Controlled, Comparative Study.

James T McCracken, James J McGough, Sandra K Loo, Jennifer Levitt, Melissa Del'Homme, Jennifer Cowen, Alexandra Sturm, Fiona Whelan, Gerhard Hellemann, Catherine Sugar and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00429273 (An Eight-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Guanfacine, Focalin XR, and the Combination, With a Twelve Month Open-Label Extension for the Treatment of ADHD in Pediatric Subjects Aged 7 to 14 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00429273 phase4completednot on this map

An Eight-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Guanfacine, Focalin XR, and the Combination, With a Twelve Month Open-Label Extension for the Treatment of ADHD in Pediatric Subjects Aged 7 to 14 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2007 to 2011Enrolled212ConditionsAttention Deficit Disorder With HyperactivityArmsGuanfacine, Methylphenidate (MPH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Inter-hemispheric Asymmetry Patterns in the ADHD Brain: A Neuroimaging Replication Study.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James T McCrackenDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA. Electronic address: jmccracken@mednet.ucla.edu.
James J McGoughDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Sandra K LooDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Jennifer LevittDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Melissa Del'HommeDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Jennifer CowenUCLA and the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Alexandra SturmDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Fiona WhelanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Gerhard HellemannDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
Catherine SugarDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA; UCLA School of Public Health.
Robert M BilderDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA; UCLA College of Letters and Science.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

Translational Research to Enhance Cognitive ControlP50MH077248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MCCRACKEN, JAMES T. · 2006 to 2011
$9.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH077248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBecause models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) therapeutics emphasize benefits of both enhanced dopaminergic and noradrenergic signaling, strategies to enhance D1 and α2A agonism may yield enhanced clinical and cognitive responses. This study tested the hypothesis that combined effects of a dopamine and noradrenergic agonist, d-methylphenidate extended-release (DMPH) with guanfacine (GUAN), an α2A receptor agonist, would be clinically superior to either monotherapy and would have equal tolerability.

methodAn 8-week, double-blind, 3-arm, comparative trial randomized 7- to 14-year-olds with DSM-IV ADHD to GUAN (1-3 mg/day), DMPH (5-20 mg/day), or a combination (COMB) with fixed-flexible dosing. Outcome measures were the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Data on adverse events and safety measures were obtained.

resultsA total of 207 participants were randomized and received drug. Analyses showed significant treatment group main effects for ADHD-RS-IV ADHD total (p = .0001) and inattentive symptoms (p = .0001). COMB demonstrated small but consistently greater reductions in ADHD-RS-IV Inattentive subscale scores versus monotherapies (DMPH: p = .05; f(2) = .02; and GUAN: p = .02; f(2) = .02), and was associated with a greater positive response rate by CGI-I (p = .01). No serious cardiovascular events occurred. Sedation, somnolence, lethargy, and fatigue were greater in both guanfacine groups. All treatments were well tolerated.

conclusionCOMB showed consistent evidence of clinical benefits over monotherapies, possibly reflecting advantages of greater combined dopaminergic and α2A agonism. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, and COMB treatment showed no differences in safety or tolerability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Single Versus Combination Medication Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Project1); http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00429273.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGuanfacineHumansMaleMethylphenidateAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsCentral Nervous System StimulantsGuanfacineMethylphenidateADHDalpha2Achildrenguanfacinemethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID27453079
PMCPMC4976782
OpenAlexW2416192894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.