ArticleApplied clinical informatics2016
Electronic data collection in epidemiological research. The use of REDCap in the Pelotas birth cohorts.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) for Population-Based Data Collection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The 2019 Rio Grande birth cohort: profile of a Brazilian 5-year study on mental health conditions.Epidemiology and health · 2025Article
- Nepal Family Cohort study: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Does electronic data collection perform better than paper-based data collection in health research fieldwork? A participatory action research in Zanzibar.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Roles considered important for hospitalist and non-hospitalist generalist practice in Japan: a survey study.BMC primary care · 2023Observational
- Ten Years of Medical Informatics and Standards Support for Clinical Research in an Infectious Diseases Network.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Tailoring Mobile Data Collection for Intervention Research in a Challenging Context: Development and Implementation in the Malakit Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Design of an Integrated Clinical Research Informatics System for a Multi-Centre and Multi-Visit Prospective Birth Cohort Study.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2022Article
- Development and evaluation of an online questionnaire to identify women at high and low risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Stealthing among university students: associated factors.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022Article
- Large-Scale Observational Study on the Current Status and Challenges of General Medicine in Japan: Job Description and Required Skills.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Toward Establishing Integrated, Comprehensive, and Sustainable Meningitis Surveillance in Africa to Better Inform Vaccination Strategies.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a COVID-19 randomized controlled trial: a practical example.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Electronic data collection for multi-country, hospital-based, clinical observation of maternal and newborn care: EN-BIRTH study experiences.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Barriers and motivators to participation and retention in HIV/HCV cohort studies among people who inject drugs: a community consultation in Iran.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020Article
- Article
- Public and Population Health Informatics: The Bridging of Big Data to Benefit Communities.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Review
- Using Digital Technologies in Clinical HIV Research: Real-World Applications and Considerations for Future Work.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis paper describes the use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to conduct one of the follow-up waves of the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort. The aim is to point out the advantages and limitations of using this electronic data capture environment to collect data and control every step of a longitudinal epidemiological research, specially in terms of time savings and data quality.
methodsWe used REDCap as the main tool to support the conduction of a birth cohort follow-up. By exploiting several REDCap features, we managed to schedule assessments, collect data, and control the study workflow. To enhance data quality, we developed specific reports and field validations to depict inconsistencies in real time.
resultsUsing REDCap it was possible to investigate more variables without significant increases on the data collection time, when comparing to a previous birth cohort follow-up. In addition, better data quality was achieved since negligible out of range errors and no validation or missing inconsistencies were identified after applying over 7,000 interviews.
conclusionsAdopting electronic data capture solutions, such as REDCap, in epidemiological research can bring several advantages over traditional paper-based data collection methods. In favor of improving their features, more research groups should migrate from paper to electronic-based epidemiological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.