Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27452883›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Primary Care Physicians' Experiences With and Attitudes Toward Pediatric Quality Reporting.

Joseph S Zickafoose, Henry T Ireys, Adam Swinburn, Lisa A Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph S ZickafooseMathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, Mich. Electronic address: jzickafoose@mathematica-mpr.com.
Henry T IreysMathematica Policy Research and AcademyHealth, Washington, DC.
Adam SwinburnMathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Lisa A SimpsonMathematica Policy Research and AcademyHealth, Washington, DC.

Funding

AHRQ HHS HHSA29020090002191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess primary care providers' experiences with and attitudes toward pediatric-focused quality reports and identify key associated physician/practice characteristics.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey of pediatricians and family physicians providing primary care to publicly insured children in 3 states (North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania). The survey included questions about receipt of pediatric quality reports, use of reports for quality improvement (QI), and beliefs about the effectiveness of reports for QI. We used multivariable analyses to assess associations between responses and physician/practice characteristics, including exposure to federally funded demonstration projects aimed at increasing quality reporting to physicians serving publicly insured children. We supplemented these analyses with a thematic investigation of data from 46 interviews with physicians, practice staff, and state demonstration staff.

resultsSeven hundred twenty-seven physicians responded to the survey (overall response rate: 45.2%). Most physicians were receiving quality reports related to pediatric care (79.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2%-82.4%) and believed that quality reports can be effective in helping guide QI (70.5%; 95% CI, 67.5%-73.5%). Fewer used quality reports to guide QI efforts (32.5%; 95% CI, 29.5%-35.6%). There were no significant associations between demonstration exposure and experiences or attitudes. Interview data suggested that physicians were receptive to quality reporting, but significant barriers remain to using such reports for QI, such as limited staff time or training in QI.

conclusionsAlthough pediatric quality reporting is considered a promising strategy, in this study, state efforts appeared insufficient to overcome the barriers to using reports to guide practice-based QI.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPediatriciansPhysicians, FamilyPhysicians, Primary CareQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaOhioPennsylvaniaQuality of Health Carephysician surveyprimary carequality measurementquality reporting

Identifiers

PMID27452883
PMCPMC5847285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.