Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27452365›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2016

RNA Structural Modules Control the Rate and Pathway of RNA Folding and Assembly.

Brant Gracia, Yi Xue, Namita Bisaria, Daniel Herschlag, Hashim M Al-Hashimi, Rick Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rho (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Repair of MutatedCancers · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Thoughts on how to think (and talk) about RNA structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brant GraciaDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and the Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Yi XueDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Namita BisariaDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Daniel HerschlagDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Hashim M Al-HashimiDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Rick RussellDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and the Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: rick_russell@cm.utexas.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Time-resolved small angle X-ray scatteringP01GM066275 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERSCHLAG, DANIEL · 2003 to 2017
$17.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM066275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured RNAs fold through multiple pathways, but we have little understanding of the molecular features that dictate folding pathways and determine rates along a given pathway. Here, we asked whether folding of a complex RNA can be understood from its structural modules. In a two-piece version of the Tetrahymena group I ribozyme, the separated P5abc subdomain folds to local native secondary and tertiary structure in a linked transition and assembles with the ribozyme core via three tertiary contacts: a kissing loop (P14), a metal core-receptor interaction, and a tetraloop-receptor interaction, the first two of which are expected to depend on native P5abc structure from the local transition. Native gel, NMR, and chemical footprinting experiments showed that mutations that destabilize the native P5abc structure slowed assembly up to 100-fold, indicating that P5abc folds first and then assembles with the core by conformational selection. However, rate decreases beyond 100-fold were not observed because an alternative pathway becomes dominant, with nonnative P5abc binding the core and then undergoing an induced-fit rearrangement. P14 is formed in the rate-limiting step along the conformational selection pathway but after the rate-limiting step along the induced-fit pathway. Strikingly, the assembly rate along the conformational selection pathway resembles that of an isolated kissing loop similar to P14, and the rate along the induced-fit pathway resembles that of an isolated tetraloop-receptor interaction. Our results indicate substantial modularity in RNA folding and assembly and suggest that these processes can be understood in terms of underlying structural modules.

Indexed as

RNA FoldingDNA Mutational AnalysisElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, CatalyticTetrahymenaRNA, Catalyticbiomolecular interactionsgroup I intronP5abcRNA foldingthree-helix junction

Identifiers

PMID27452365
PMCPMC5048535
OpenAlexW2483473444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.