ArticleLeukemia2016
Standardization of molecular monitoring for chronic myeloid leukemia in Latin America using locally produced secondary cellular calibrators.
Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-depth characterization of NK cell markers from CML patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Immune checkpoints PD1/PDL1, TIM3/GAL9 and key immune mediators landscape reveal differential expression dynamics on imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Elevated plasma levels of IL-6 and MCP-1 selectively identify CML patients who better sustain molecular remission after TKI withdrawal.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Article
- Development and evaluation of armored RNA-based standards for quantification of BCR-ABL1Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the primitive fraction by functionalOncotarget · 2018Article
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Is the Best Strategy to Start and Monitor Treatment Outside Academic Centers?Current oncology reports · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.