Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27451859›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2016

Women's Understanding of the Term 'Pap smear': A Comparison of Spanish-Speaking Versus English-Speaking Women.

David L Howard, Beth Soulli, Nicole Johnson, Saladin Cooper

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David L HowardWellHealth Quality Care/Las Vegas Minimally Invasive Surgery, 9260 West Sunset Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89147, USA. dhoward3@gmail.com.
Beth SoulliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
Nicole JohnsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
Saladin CooperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To compare the understanding of the term 'Pap smear' among Spanish-speaking women, as compared to their English-speaking counterparts. Methods Surveys were distributed to English and Spanish speaking female patients in an urban Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic. Patients were at least 18 years old or they were less than 18 years old and pregnant. Results A majority of participants (77.3 % English-speaking vs. 74.1 % Spanish-speaking, respectively) were able to identify at least one correct descriptor for the term Pap smear. However, Spanish-speaking women were significantly less likely to choose incorrect descriptors. Spanish-speaking women were much less likely to say that a Pap smear was the same as a Pelvic exam (45.7 vs. 78.8 %; p = 0.001), or a test for a sexually transmitted disease (25 vs. 60.6 %; p = 0.001). Conclusions for Practice Compared to English-speaking women, Spanish-speaking women are much less likely to conflate a pelvic exam with a Pap smear. Overall understanding was suboptimal, regardless of primary language, indicating that major efforts are still needed to improve functional health literacy with respect to cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Gynecological ExaminationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapanicolaou TestVaginal SmearsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLanguageMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsWomen's HealthYoung AdultCervical cancerPap smearPelvic examSpanish-speakingUnderstanding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.