ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2017
Evaluation of Commercial Assays for Single-Point Diagnosis of Pertussis in the US.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of a pentavalent DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine in healthy Indian infants-A randomized study.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPertussis serodiagnosis is increasingly being used in the United States despite the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, commercially available assay. To better understand the utility of these assays in diagnosing pertussis, serology assays were evaluated for analytical parameters and clinical accuracy.
methodsForty-three antigen-antibody combinations were evaluated for single-point diagnosis of pertussis. Serum panels included sera from laboratory-confirmed cases, an international reference standard, and healthy donors. Phase I panel (n = 20) of sera was used to assess precision, linearity, and accuracy; Phase II panel (n = 226) followed with positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) estimates. Analytical analyses included coefficients of variation (CV) and concordance correlation coefficients (rc).
resultsIntra-analyst variability was found to be relatively low among samples per assay, with only 6% (78 of 1240) having CV >20%, primarily with the highly concentrated immunoglobulin (Ig)G anti-pertussis toxin (PT) specimens and IgM assays. The rc measurements to assess linearity ranged between 0.282 and 0.994, 0.332 and 0.999, and -0.056 and 0.482 for IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively. Analytical accuracy for calibrated IgG anti-PT assays was 86%-115%. The PPA and NPA varied greatly for all assays; PPA/NPA ranges for IgA, IgG, and IgM assays, with culture and/or polymerase chain reaction positivity as control, were 29-90/13-100, 26-96/27-100, and 0-73/42-100, respectively. In IgG assays, mixing filamentous hemagglutinin antigen with PT increased PPA but decreased NPA.
conclusionsSeroassays varied substantially under both analytical and clinical parameters; however, those that were calibrated to a reference standard were highly accurate. Our findings support incorporation of calibrated pertussis seroassays to the pertussis case definition for improved diagnosis and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.