Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27451417›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2017

Novel public health risk assessment process developed to support syndromic surveillance for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Gillian E Smith, Alex J Elliot, Sue Ibbotson, Roger Morbey, Obaghe Edeghere, Jeremy Hawker, Mike Catchpole, Tina Endericks, Paul Fisher, Brian McCloskey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating multi-purpose syndromic surveillance systems - a complex problem.Online journal of public health informatics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gillian E SmithReal-Time Syndromic Surveillance Team, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Alex J ElliotReal-Time Syndromic Surveillance Team, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Sue IbbotsonPublic Health England Centre, West Midlands, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Roger MorbeyReal-Time Syndromic Surveillance Team, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Obaghe EdeghereField Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Jeremy HawkerField Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Mike CatchpolePublic Health England Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Tina EndericksDepartment of Global Health, Wellington House, 133 to 155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, UK.
Paul FisherReal-Time Syndromic Surveillance Team, Public Health England, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
Brian McCloskeyDepartment of Global Health, Wellington House, 133 to 155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Syndromic surveillance aims to provide early warning and real time estimates of the extent of incidents; and reassurance about lack of impact of mass gatherings. We describe a novel public health risk assessment process to ensure those leading the response to the 2012 Olympic Games were alerted to unusual activity that was of potential public health importance, and not inundated with multiple statistical 'alarms'. Methods: Statistical alarms were assessed to identify those which needed to result in 'alerts' as reliably as possible. There was no previously developed method for this. We identified factors that increased our concern about an alarm suggesting that an 'alert' should be made. Results: Between 2 July and 12 September 2012, 350 674 signals were analysed resulting in 4118 statistical alarms. Using the risk assessment process, 122 'alerts' were communicated to Olympic incident directors. Conclusions: Use of a novel risk assessment process enabled the interpretation of large number of statistical alarms in a manageable way for the period of a sustained mass gathering. This risk assessment process guided the prioritization and could be readily adapted to other surveillance systems. The process, which is novel to our knowledge, continues as a legacy of the Games.

Indexed as

Sentinel SurveillanceSportsCrowdingHumansPublic Health PracticeRisk Assessmentmass gatherings, risk assessment process, syndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID27451417
PMCPMC5939868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.