Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27450925›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2016

An automated rat single pellet reaching system with high-speed video capture.

Damien J Ellens, Matt Gaidica, Andrew Toader, Sophia Peng, Shirley Shue, Titus John, Alexandra Bova, Daniel K Leventhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A paradigm for skilled forelimb reaching by head-restrained mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Damien J EllensDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Matt GaidicaNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Andrew ToaderDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Sophia PengDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Shirley ShueDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Titus JohnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Alexandra BovaNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Daniel K LeventhalNeurology Service, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: dleventh@med.umich.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN CLINICAL AND BASIC NEUROSCIENCET32NS007222 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Henry L Paulson · 1985 to 2026
$8.0M
Early Stage Training in the NeurosciencesT32NS076401 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Carol Fuzeti Elias, LESLIE S. SATIN · 2011 to 2026
$3.1M
Neuronal Oscillations and Dysregulated Motor Learning in Parkinsonian RatsK08NS072183 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEVENTHAL, DANIEL K · 2013 to 2017
$938k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS072183NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007222NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS076401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle pellet reaching is an established task for studying fine motor control in which rats reach for, grasp, and eat food pellets in a stereotyped sequence. Most incarnations of this task require constant attention, limiting the number of animals that can be tested and the number of trials per session. Automated versions allow more interventions in more animals, but must be robust and reproducible. NEW

methodOur system automatically delivers single reward pellets for rats to grasp with their forepaw. Reaches are detected using real-time computer vision, which triggers video acquisition from multiple angles using mirrors. This allows us to record high-speed (>300 frames per second) video, and trigger interventions (e.g., optogenetics) with high temporal precision. Individual video frames are triggered by digital pulses that can be synchronized with behavior, experimental interventions, or recording devices (e.g., electrophysiology). The system is housed within a soundproof chamber with integrated lighting and ventilation, allowing multiple skilled reaching systems in one room.

resultsWe show that rats acquire the automated task similarly to manual versions, that the task is robust, and can be synchronized with optogenetic interventions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsExisting skilled reaching protocols require high levels of investigator involvement, or, if ad libitum, do not allow for integration of high-speed, synchronized data collection.

conclusionThis task will facilitate the study of motor learning and control by efficiently recording large numbers of skilled movements. It can be adapted for use with modern neurophysiology, which demands high temporal precision.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsVideo RecordingAnimalsAutomation, LaboratoryEquipment DesignFoodForelimbLearningMaleOptogeneticsRats, Long-EvansTime FactorsAutomated taskForelimbMotor learningRatSingle pellet graspingSkilled reaching

Identifiers

PMID27450925
PMCPMC5003677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.