Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27450763›Full record

ArticleClinical neurology and neurosurgery2016

The combined EGFR protein expression analysis refines the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma.

Paolo Tini, Pierpaolo Pastina, Valerio Nardone, Lucio Sebaste, Marzia Toscano, Clelia Miracco, Alfonso Cerase, Luigi Pirtoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Glioblastoma Genomics Primer for Clinicians.Medical research archives · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Impact ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo TiniIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy. Electronic address: paolo-tini@libero.it.
Pierpaolo PastinaIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Valerio NardoneIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Lucio SebasteIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Marzia ToscanoIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Clelia MiraccoIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Alfonso CeraseIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Unit of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luigi PirtoliIstitutoToscanoTumori, Firenze, Italy; Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy; Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo investigate the combined prognostic value of the EGFR expression level and the MGMT promoter methylation status in Glioblastoma (GB).

methodsWe assessed the EGFR protein expression level by immune-histochemical (IHC) evaluation and the MGMT promoter methylation status by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in 169 patients affected by GB. We assessed the prognostic significance of combined MGMT methylation status and EGFR expression level in terms of Overall Survival (OS) with univariate and multivariate analysis, and validated this finding using an external data set of GB patient.

resultsClustering survival analysis for the methylation status of MGMT (methMGMT/unmethMGMT) and EGFR expression (High EGFR: H-EGFR; Low EGFR: L-EGFR), identified three different prognostic groups (p=0.001), as follows. Patients with unmethMGMT/H-EGFR had the shortest survival time (median OS: 5 months) and patients co-expressing methMGMT/L-EGFR had the best prognosis (median OS: 35 months), as compared to the other two sub-groups (methMGMT/H-EGFR; unmethMGMT/L-EGFR), which had respectively median OSs of 11 and 12 months. The combined MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification status analysis showed a similar prognostic impact in an independent series, which we used for validation (p=0.001).

conclusionsThe EGFR expression evaluation refines the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status in GBs.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene ExpressionBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsGlioblastomaHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsEGFRGlioblastomaMGMTPrognostic markersRadiotherapyTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID27450763
OpenAlexW2497919106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.