Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27450643›Full record

ReviewSeizure2016

Antibody-associated epilepsies: Clinical features, evidence for immunotherapies and future research questions.

Ochuko D Bakpa, Markus Reuber, Sarosh R Irani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seizure, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. GAD65 Antibody-Associated Epilepsy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  4. Neuroinflammation: A Signature or a Cause of Epilepsy?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Autoimmune epilepsy: findings on MRI and FDG-PET.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. The clinical features, underlying immunology, and treatment of autoantibody-mediated movement disorders.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Antiepileptic drug therapy in patients with autoimmune epilepsy.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ochuko D BakpaAcademic Neurology Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Markus ReuberAcademic Neurology Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Sarosh R IraniNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK. Electronic address: sarosh.irani@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe growing recognition of epilepsies and encephalopathies associated with autoantibodies against surface neuronal proteins (LGI1, NMDAR, CASPR2, GABABR, and AMPAR) means that epileptologists are increasingly asking questions about mechanisms of antibody-mediated epileptogenesis, and about the use of immunotherapies. This review summarizes clinical and paraclinical observations related to autoimmune epilepsies, examines the current evidence for the effectiveness of immunotherapy, and makes epilepsy-specific recommendations for future research.

methodSystematic literature search with summary and review of the identified publications. Studies describing the clinical characteristics of autoantibody-associated epilepsies and treatments are detailed in tables.

resultsLiterature describing the clinical manifestations and treatment of autoimmune epilepsies associated with neuronal cell-surface autoantibodies (NSAbs) is largely limited to retrospective case series. We systematically summarize the features of particular interest to epileptologists dividing patients into those with acute or subacute encephalopathies associated with epilepsy, and those with chronic epilepsy without encephalopathy. Available observational studies suggest that immunotherapies are effective in some clinical circumstances but outcome data collection methods require greater standardization.

conclusionsThe clinical experience captured suggests that clusters of clinical features associate well with specific NSAbs. Intensive and early immunotherapy is indicated when patients present with autoantibody-associated encephalopathies. It remains unclear how patients with chronic epilepsy and the same autoantibodies should be assessed and treated. Tables in this paper provide a comprehensive resource for systematic descriptions of both clinical features and treatments, and highlight limitations of current studies.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesDatabases, BibliographicEpilepsyHumansImmunotherapyAutoantibodiesAutoantibodiesAutoimmuneFaciobrachial dystonic seizuresGABA receptorImmunotherapyLGI1NMDA receptor

Identifiers

PMID27450643
PMCPMC5042290
OpenAlexW2503182403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.