Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27450411›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2016

Study protocol, rationale and recruitment in a European multi-centre randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of azithromycin maintenance therapy for 6 months in primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Helene E Kobbernagel, Frederik F Buchvald, Eric G Haarman, Carmen Casaulta, Samuel A Collins, Claire Hogg, Claudia E Kuehni, Jane S Lucas, Heymut Omran, Alexandra L Quittner and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Head-to-head trials of antibiotics for bronchiectasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chronic airway disease in primary ciliary dyskinesia-spiced with geno-phenotype associations.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current and Future Treatments in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. [Management of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia].Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Proceedings of the 4BMC proceedings · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD): A genetic disorder of motile cilia.Translational science of rare diseases · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Helene E KobbernagelDanish Paediatric Pulmonary Service, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederik F BuchvaldDanish Paediatric Pulmonary Service, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eric G HaarmanDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Carmen CasaultaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Samuel A CollinsPCD Centre, NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit and Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Claire HoggPaediatric Respiratory Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Claudia E KuehniInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jane S LucasPCD Centre, NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit and Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Heymut OmranDepartment of General Paediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Alexandra L QuittnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Claudius WernerDepartment of General Paediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Kim G NielsenDanish Paediatric Pulmonary Service, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. kgn@dadlnet.dk.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity Hospital Münster · DEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Southampton · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical management of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) respiratory disease is currently based on improving mucociliary clearance and controlling respiratory infections, through the administration of antibiotics. Treatment practices in PCD are largely extrapolated from more common chronic respiratory disorders, particularly cystic fibrosis, but no randomized controlled trials (RCT) have ever evaluated efficacy and safety of any pharmacotherapeutics used in the treatment of PCD. Maintenance therapy, with the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin, is currently widely used in chronic respiratory diseases including PCD. In addition to its antibacterial properties, azithromycin is considered to have beneficial anti-inflammatory and anti-quorum-sensing properties. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of azithromycin maintenance therapy for 6 months on respiratory exacerbations in PCD. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin on lung function, ventilation inhomogeneity, hearing impairment, and symptoms (respiratory, sinus, ears and hearing) measured on a PCD-specific health-related quality of life instrument, and to assess the safety of azithromycin maintenance therapy in PCD.

methodsThe BESTCILIA trial is a European multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The intervention is tablets of azithromycin 250/500 mg according to body weight or placebo administered three times a week for 6 months. Subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of PCD, age 7-50 years, are eligible for inclusion. Chronic pulmonary infections with Gram-negative bacteria or any recent occurrence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria are exclusion criteria. The planned number of subjects to be included is 125. The trial has been approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the participating institutions. DISCUSSION: We present a study protocol of an ongoing RCT, evaluating for the first time, the efficacy and safety of a pharmacotherapeutic treatment for patients with PCD. The RCT evaluates azithromycin maintenance therapy, a drug already commonly prescribed in other chronic respiratory disorders. Furthermore, the trial will utilize the Lung clearance index and new, PCD-specific quality of life instruments as outcome measures for PCD. Recruitment is hampered by frequent occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, exacerbations at enrolment, and the patients' perception of disease severity and necessity of additional management and treatment during trial participation.

trial registrationEudraCT 2013-004664-58 (date of registration: 2014-04-08).

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEuropeFemaleHumansKartagener SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRegression AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinAzithromycinExacerbationHealth-related quality of lifeLung clearance indexMultiple breath washoutPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaQOL-PCD

Identifiers

PMID27450411
PMCPMC4957315
OpenAlexW2483120712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.