ArticleBMC family practice2016
Applying clinical guidelines in general practice: a qualitative study of potential complications.
Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical and operational insights from data-driven care pathway mapping: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Pooled it
- General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Guideline adherence for the management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- From global guidelines for cardio-kidney-metabolic diseases management to national implementation: perspectives from the guideline workshop taskforce.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- General practitioners and management control through guidelines: a qualitative study of its effects on their practice.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Prolonged Prescription Rates of Z-Hypnotics Among Individuals with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Insomnia: The HUNT Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- GPs' decision-making behaviour in the prescription of aspirin for primary prevention in elderly individuals: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews in France.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Importance, facilitators and barriers for finnish general practitioner involvement in clinical practice guideline panels: a survey.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Beyond words: operationalizing inclusive language in Australian cervical screening health promotion policy.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers to use of clinical practice guidelines among physicians in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Assessing TDApp: An AI-based clinical decision support system for ADHD treatment recommendations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- General practitioners' assessment and management of chronic kidney disease in older patients- a mixed methods study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- A scoping review of evidence-based guidance and guidelines published by general practice professional organizations.Family practice · 2024Article
- Decision Support for Managing Common Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders: Development of a Case-Based Reasoning Application.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Primary care utilisation, adherence to guideline-based pharmacotherapy and continuity of care in primary care patients with chronic diseases and multimorbidity - a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Developing a Questionnaire Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors on Audit & Feedback among General Practitioners: A Mixed Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical guidelines for single diseases often pose problems in general practice work with multimorbid patients. However, little research focuses on how general practice is affected by the demand to follow multiple guidelines. This study explored Norwegian general practitioners' (GPs') experiences with and reflections upon the consequences for general practice of applying multiple guidelines.
methodsQualitative focus group study carried out in Mid-Norway. The study involved a purposeful sample of 25 Norwegian GPs from four pre-existing groups. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using systematic text condensation, i.e. applying a phenomenological approach.
resultsThe GPs' responses clustered around two major topics: 1) Complications for the GPs of applying multiple guidelines; and, 2) Complications for their patients when GPs apply multiple guidelines. For the GPs, applying multiple guidelines created a highly problematic situation as they felt obliged to implement guidelines that were not suited to their patients: too often, the map and the terrain did not match. They also experienced greater insecurity regarding their own practice which, they admitted, resulted in an increased tendency to practice 'defensive medicine'. For their patients, the GPs experienced that applying multiple guidelines increased the risk of polypharmacy, excessive non-pharmacological recommendations, a tendency toward medicalization and, for some, a reduction in quality of life.
conclusionsThe GPs experienced negative consequences when obliged to apply a variety of single disease guidelines to multimorbid patients, including increased risk of polypharmacy and overtreatment. We believe patient-centered care and the GPs' courage to non-comply when necessary may aid in reducing these risks. Health care authorities and guideline developers need to be aware of the potential negative effects of applying a single disease focus in general practice, where multimorbidity is highly prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.