Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27449869›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2016

Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis-Limitations and Need for Innovation.

Catriona S Bradshaw, Jack D Sobel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Regulatory Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catriona S BradshawMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Jack D SobelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUWayne State University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300012CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300012I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practitioners and patients alike widely recognize the limitations of current therapeutic approaches to the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Options remain extremely limited, and our inability to prevent the frequently, often relentless symptomatic recurrences of BV and to reduce serious sequelae such as preterm delivery, remains an acknowledged but unresolved shortcoming. Our incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of this unique form of vaginal dysbiosis has been a significant impediment to developing optimal treatment and prevention approaches. New drugs have not been forthcoming and are not likely to be available in the immediate future; hence, reliance on the optimal use of available agents has become essential as improvised often unproven regimens are implemented. In this review, we will explore the limitations of currently recommended therapies, with a particular focus on the contribution of reinfection and pathogen persistence to BV recurrence, and the development of interventions that target these mechanisms. Ultimately, to achieve sustained cure and effectiveness against BV-associated sequelae, it is possible that we will need approaches that combine antimicrobials with biofilm-disrupting agents and partner treatments in those at risk of reinfection.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBiofilmsDysbiosisFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHumansMalePenisRecurrenceSexually Transmitted Diseases, BacterialVaginaVaginosis, BacterialAnti-Infective Agentsbacterial vaginosisrecurrencetreatment approaches

Identifiers

PMID27449869
PMCPMC4957510
OpenAlexW2479024870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.