Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27449868›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2016

Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis: Discussion of Current Hypotheses.

Christina A Muzny, Jane R Schwebke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Comparative Epidemiology and Co-Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial vaginosis: an overlooked STI?Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina A MuznyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Jane R SchwebkeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Women Who Have Sex with WomenK23AI106957 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MUZNY, CHRISTINA A · 2014 to 2018
$873k
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300012CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300012INIAID NIH HHS K23 AI106957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In April 2015, the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases hosted an experts technical consultation on bacterial vaginosis (BV), where data regarding controversies over the pathogenesis of BV were discussed. The discussion on the epidemiology and pathogenesis of BV is presented here, and several hypotheses on its pathogenesis are critiqued. Rigorous hypothesis-driven studies are needed to ultimately determine the cause of BV. This information is vital for the prevention and control of this important infection and its adverse public health consequences.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionFemaleGardnerella vaginalisGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansModels, BiologicalPublic HealthVaginaVaginosis, Bacterialbacterial vaginosisGardnerellavaginal flora

Identifiers

PMID27449868
PMCPMC4957507
OpenAlexW2482776958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.