Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27449782›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Deployment and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Primary Findings and Methodological Considerations.

Jodie Katon, Yasmin Cypel, Mubashra Raza, Laurie Zephyrin, Gayle Reiber, Elizabeth M Yano, Shannon Barth, Aaron Schneiderman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The impact of military sexual trauma and warfare exposure on women veterans' perinatal outcomes.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2022
    Article
  5. The Gulf War Women's Health Cohort: Study Design and Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Deployment and Preterm Birth Among US Army Soldiers.American journal of epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jodie KatonUS Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Patient Care Services, Women's Health Services, Washington, DC, USA. jodie.katon@va.gov.
Yasmin CypelVA Office of Public Health, Post Deployment Health Strategic Healthcare Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Mubashra RazaVA Office of Public Health, Post Deployment Health Strategic Healthcare Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Laurie ZephyrinUS Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Patient Care Services, Women's Health Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Gayle ReiberVA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbia Way S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Elizabeth M YanoVA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shannon BarthVA Office of Public Health, Post Deployment Health Strategic Healthcare Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Aaron SchneidermanVA Office of Public Health, Post Deployment Health Strategic Healthcare Group, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To characterize the pregnancy outcomes of women Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans including prevalence of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and macrosomia, and to highlight methodological limitations that can impact findings. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted starting in 2014 analyzing data from the 2009 to 2011 National Health Study for a New Generation of US Veterans, which sampled Veterans deployed and not deployed to OIF/OEF. All pregnancies resulting in a live birth were included, and categorized as occurring among non-deployers, before deployment, during deployment, or after deployment. Outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia. The association of deployment with selected outcomes was estimated using separate general estimating equations to account for lack of outcome independence among women contributing multiple pregnancies. Adjustment variables included maternal age at outcome, and race/ethnicity. Results There were 2276 live births (191 preterm births, 153 low birth weight infants, and 272 macrosomic infants). Compared with pregnancies before deployment, pregnancies among non-deployers and those after deployment appeared to have greater risk of preterm birth [non-deployers: odds ratio (OR) = 2.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 3.72; after deployment: OR = 1.90, 95 % CI 0.90, 4.02]. A similar pattern was observed for low birth weight. No association of deployment with macrosomia was detected. Discussion Compared with non-deployers, those who eventually deploy appear to have better pregnancy outcomes prior to deployment, but this advantage is no longer apparent after deployment. Non-deployers may not be an appropriate reference group to study the putative health impacts of deployment on pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

PrevalenceWarfareAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesDeploymentLow birth weightOEF/OIFPreterm birthWomen Veterans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.