ArticleDiagnostic pathology2016
Glioblastoma multiforme versus pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with anaplastic features in the pathological diagnosis: a case report.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical features and surgical outcomes of high grade pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas: a single-center experience with a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Malignant transformation of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in pregnant patient: Clinical case and ethical dilemma.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Malignant transformation of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and differential diagnosis: case report.BMC neurology · 2020Article
- Demography, Pattern of Care, and Survival in Patients with Xanthoastrocytoma: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis of 325 Cases.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2019Article
- Intraoperative Frozen Cytology of Central Nervous System Neoplasms: An Ancillary Tool for Frozen Diagnosis.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) with anaplastic features should be strictly distinguished from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). CASE PRESENTATION: A case of PXA that was initially diagnosed as GBM is presented. A 42-year-old man visited our clinic because of right hemiparesis and total aphasia. Head magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated enhanced multiple cystic lesions in the left temporal lobe suggesting an intra-parenchymal brain tumor. The lesion was partially removed and GBM with a Ki-67 index of 20 % was diagnosed by pathological examination of the resected specimen. Despite receiving radiation and chemotherapy, the patient died 6 months after the first admission. At autopsy, the boundary between the tumor and normal brain tissue was clear. Large parts of the tumor demonstrated typical features of PXA, including pleomorphism, clear xanthomatous cells with foamy cytoplasm, positive silver staining, and a Ki-67 index of less than 1 %. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsGBM should be diagnosed only when the majority of the tumor cells are undifferentiated. Although the operative specimen appeared typical GBM histologically, the diagnosis of GBM was subsequently excluded by the autopsy finding that much of the tumor had the characteristic features of a benign PXA. Therefore, the final diagnosis in this case was PXA with anaplastic features. PXA with anaplastic features should be carefully distinguished from GBM to facilitate appropriate decisions concerning treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.