Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27449205›Full record

ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine

Comparative efficacy of two polyherbal creams with framycetin sulfate on diabetic wound model in rats.

Minakshi N Nehete, Sanjay Nipanikar, Anisha S Kanjilal, Sanjivan Kanjilal, Pratima A Tatke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protective Effect ofCurrent diabetes reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minakshi N NeheteC. U. Shah College of Pharmacy, S.N.D.T. Women's University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, India.
Sanjay NipanikarAri Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Anisha S KanjilalAri Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sanjivan KanjilalAri Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Pratima A TatkeC. U. Shah College of Pharmacy, S.N.D.T. Women's University, Santacruz (W), Mumbai, India. Electronic address: patatke@gmail.com.
Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus is one of the metabolic disorders that impede normal steps of wound healing process. Worldwide, 15% of the 200 million diabetics suffer from diabetic wounds. Diabetic complications, such as foot ulcer, impose major public health burdens worldwide.

objectiveThe present study was carried out to evaluate comparative efficacy of polyherbal creams with framycetin sulfate cream on diabetic rats using incision and excision wound models. MATERIALS AND

methodsAlloxan (120 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) induced diabetic rat models (incision and excision models) were used to evaluate wound healing effect of cream A, B, and framycetin sulfate. Cream A and B were applied for a period of 10 and 20 days for incision and excision wound models, respectively. Incision wound model was used to assess the effect on breaking strength. Wound contraction and epithelialization period were measured using excision wound model. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test.

resultsTensile strength of the animals treated with cream B (941.66 ± 15.36) was found to be significantly greater (P < 0.001) as compared to tensile strength of the animals treated with cream A (825 ± 22.36). Wound treated with cream B was found to heal significantly (P < 0.001) faster (day 17) as compared to wounds treated with framycetin sulfate (day 21).

conclusionsCream B was found to be more effective wound healing agent than cream A and framycetin sulfate cream in treating diabetic wounds.

Indexed as

Diabetic woundExcision modelIncision modelWound healing

Identifiers

PMID27449205
PMCPMC4969312
OpenAlexW2492463311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.