Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27449200›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

Perirhinal cortex lesions that impair object recognition memory spare landmark discriminations.

Andrew J D Nelson, Cristian M Olarte-Sánchez, Eman Amin, John P Aggleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differentiable Processing of Objects, Associations, and Scenes within the Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J D NelsonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Cristian M Olarte-SánchezSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Eman AminSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK. Electronic address: aggleton@cf.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT103722/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rats with lesions in the perirhinal cortex and their control group learnt to discriminate between mirror-imaged visual landmarks to find a submerged platform in a watermaze. Rats initially learnt this discrimination passively, in that they were repeatedly placed on the platform in one corner of a square watermaze with walls of different appearance, prior to swimming to that same location for the first time in a subsequent probe trial. Perirhinal cortex lesions spared this passively learnt ability, despite the common visual elements shared by the guiding landmarks. These results challenge models of perirhinal function that emphasise its role in solving discriminations between stimuli with ambiguous or overlapping features, while underlining how this cortical region is often not required for spatial processes that involve the hippocampus.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscrimination LearningHippocampusMaleMemoryModels, AnimalPattern Recognition, VisualPerirhinal CortexPhotic StimulationRatsRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionHippocampusNavigationParahippocampal cortex

Identifiers

PMID27449200
PMCPMC4998350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.