ArticleOncotarget2016
A nomogram composed of clinicopathologic features and preoperative serum tumor markers to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients.
Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic resection or radical gastrectomy? Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic and clinical significance of long non-coding RNA HNF1A-AS1 in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Oncologic outcomes of patients with negative nodal involvement on preoperative imaging undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Clinicopathologic characteristics and predictive nomogram of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Association of multiple tumor markers with newly diagnosed gastric cancer patients: a retrospective study.PeerJ · 2022Article
- A population-based study: how to identify high-risk T1 gastric cancer patients?American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer and Current Challenges in Determining the Extent of Metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Establishment of Decision Rules and Risk Assessment Model for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Radiomics Signature on Computed Tomography Imaging: Association With Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Construction and external validation of a nomogram that predicts lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients using preoperative parameters.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2018Article
- Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 for cancer patients in China.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients: Report from Eastern Europe country- Lithuania.BMC surgery · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Analysis of Predictors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) accurately is of great importance to formulate optimal treatment strategies preoperatively for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to explore risk factors that predict the presence of LNM in EGC. A total of 697 patients underwent gastrectomy enrolled in this study, were divided into training and validation set, and the relationship between LNM and other clinicopathologic features, preoperative serum combined tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125) were evaluated. Risk factors for LNM were identified using logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was created by R program to predict the possibility of LNM in training set, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to assess the predictive value of the nomogram model in validation set. Consequently, LNM was significantly associated with tumor size, macroscopic type, differentiation type, ulcerative findings, lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and combined tumor marker. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors including of tumor size, differentiation type, ulcerative findings, lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and combined tumor marker were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for LNM. Moreover, a predictive nomogram with these independent factors for LNM in EGC patients was constructed, and ROC curve demonstrated a good discrimination ability with the AUC of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.789-0.923), which was significantly larger than those produced in previous studies. Therefore, including of these tumor markers which could be convenient and feasible to obtain from the serum preoperatively, the nomogram could effectively predict the incidence of LNM for EGC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.