Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448961›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Pregnane X-receptor promotes stem cell-mediated colon cancer relapse.

Chris Planque, Fatemeh Rajabi, Fanny Grillet, Pascal Finetti, François Bertucci, Meritxell Gironella, Juan José Lozano, Bertrand Beucher, Julie Giraud, Véronique Garambois and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Resistance to TOP-1 Inhibitors: Good Old Drugs Still Can Surprise Us.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Allopregnanolone: Metabolism, Mechanisms of Action, and Its Role in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. FTO-mediated cytoplasmic mNature communications · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris PlanqueCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Fatemeh RajabiCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Fanny GrilletCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Pascal FinettiCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM UMR1068, CNRS UMR725, Marseille, France.
François BertucciCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM UMR1068, CNRS UMR725, Marseille, France.
Meritxell GironellaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Institut d'Investigaciones Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Juan José LozanoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Institut d'Investigaciones Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Bertrand BeucherCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Julie GiraudCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Véronique GaramboisInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Charles VincentInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Daniel BrownDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Ludovic CailloCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Jovana KantarLaboratoire de Biochimie, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France.
André PelegrinInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Michel PrudhommeService de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France.
Jérémie RipocheService de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France.
Jean François BourgauxService d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France.
Christophe GinestierCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, U1068 Inserm, Marseille, France.
Antoni CastellsCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Institut d'Investigaciones Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Frédéric HollandeCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Julie PannequinCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Jean Marc PascussiCNRS UMR5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille · FRConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FRUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer lethality usually results from post-treatment relapse in the majority of stage II-IV patients, due to the enhanced resistance of Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs). Here, we show that the nuclear receptor Pregnane X Receptor (PXR, NR1I2), behaves as a key driver of CSC-mediated tumor recurrence. First, PXR is specifically expressed in CSCs, where it drives the expression of genes involved in self-renewal and chemoresistance. Clinically, high levels of PXR correlate with poor recurrence-free survival in a cohort of >200 stage II/III colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, for whom finding biomarkers of treatment outcome is an urgent clinical need. shRNA silencing of PXR increased the chemo-sensitivity of human colon CSCs, reduced their self-renewal and tumor-initiating potential, and drastically delayed tumor recurrence in mice following chemotherapy. This study uncovers PXR as a key factor for CSC self-renewal and chemoresistance and targeting PXR thus represents a promising strategy to minimize colorectal cancer relapse by selectively sensitizing CSCs to chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeAldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyALDH1A1 protein, humanAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorNR1I2 protein, humanNr1i2 protein, mousePregnane X ReceptorReceptors, SteroidRetinal Dehydrogenasecancer stem cellcolorectal cancerPXRtumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID27448961
PMCPMC5302934
OpenAlexW2487757405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.