Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448818›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles identifies differential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Somsak Likhitrattanapisal, Jaitip Tipanee, Tavan Janvilisri

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Circulating Biomarkers for Predicting Infliximab Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Bioinformatics Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somsak LikhitrattanapisalFaculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Jaitip TipaneeDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Tavan JanvilisriDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. tavan.jan@mahidol.ac.th.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are the members of hepatobiliary diseases. Both types of cancer often exert high levels of similarity in terms of phenotypic characteristics, thus leading to difficulties in HCC and CCA differential diagnoses. In this study, a transcriptome meta-analysis was performed on HCC and CCA microarray data to identify differential transcriptome networks and potential biomarkers for HCC and CCA. Raw data from nine gene expression profiling datasets, consisting of 1,185 samples in total, were methodologically compiled and analyzed. To evaluate differentially expressed (DE) genes in HCC and CCA, the levels of gene expression were compared between cancer and its normal counterparts (i.e., HCC versus normal liver and CCA versus normal bile duct) using t test (P < 0.05) and k-fold validation. A total of 226 DE genes were specific to HCC, 249 DE genes specific to CCA, and 41 DE genes in both HCC and CCA. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses revealed different patterns between functional transcriptome networks of HCC and CCA. Cell cycle and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways were exclusively dysregulated in HCC whereas complement and coagulation cascades as well as glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism were prodominantly differentially expressed in CCA. Our meta-analysis revealed distinct dysregulation in transcriptome networks between HCC and CCA. Certain genes in these networks were discussed in the context of HCC and CCA transition, unique characteristics of HCC and CCA, and their potentials as HCC and CCA differential biomarkers.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaDatabases, GeneticDiagnosis, DifferentialGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLiver NeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCholangiocarcinomaHepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysisMicroarray

Identifiers

PMID27448818
OpenAlexW2500576839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.