Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448800›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units: a mixed methods study assessing barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence.

Nasia Safdar, Jackson S Musuuza, Anping Xie, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Matthew Hall, Kenneth Wood, Pascale Carayon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Putting the Dissemination and Implementation in Infectious Diseases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nasia SafdarWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA. ns2@medicine.wisc.edu.
Jackson S MusuuzaInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Anping XieArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ann Schoofs HundtCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew HallDepartment of Infectious Medicine, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Kenneth WoodR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pascale CarayonCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USJohns Hopkins University · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America/The American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the mere presence of guidelines is rarely sufficient to promote widespread adoption and uptake. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model framework, we undertook a study to understand barriers and facilitators to the adoption of the IDSA/ATS guidelines.

methodsWe conducted surveys and focus group discussions of different health care providers involved in the management of VAP. The setting was medical-surgical ICUs at a tertiary academic hospital and a large multispecialty rural hospital in Wisconsin, USA.

resultsOverall, we found that 55 % of participants indicated that they were aware of the IDSA/ATS guideline. The top ranked barriers to VAP management included: 1) having multiple physician groups managing VAP, 2) variation in VAP management by differing ICU services, 3) physicians and level of training, and 4) renal failure complicating doses of antibiotics. Facilitators to VAP management included presence of multidisciplinary rounds that include nurses, pharmacist and respiratory therapists, and awareness of the IDSA/ATS guideline. This awareness was associated with receiving effective training on management of VAP, keeping up to date on nosocomial infection literature, and belief that performing a bronchoscopy to diagnose VAP would help with expeditious diagnosis of VAP.

conclusionsFindings from our study complement existing studies by identifying perceptions of the many different types of healthcare workers in ICU settings. These findings have implications for antibiotic stewardship teams, clinicians, and organizational leaders.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'WisconsinBarriers and facilitatorsGuidelinesSystems Engineering Initiative for Patient SafetyVAPVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID27448800
PMCPMC4957386
OpenAlexW2494126982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.