Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448663›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physical activity loyalty scheme for behaviour change maintenance: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Ruth F Hunter, Sarah F Brennan, Jianjun Tang, Oliver J Smith, Jennifer Murray, Mark A Tully, Chris Patterson, Alberto Longo, George Hutchinson, Lindsay Prior and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruth F HunterUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland. ruth.hunter@qub.ac.uk.
Sarah F BrennanUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Jianjun TangUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Oliver J SmithUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Jennifer MurrayUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Mark A TullyUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Chris PattersonUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Alberto LongoSchool of Biological Sciences/UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
George HutchinsonSchool of Biological Sciences/UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Lindsay PriorSchool of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work/UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
David P FrenchSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Jean AdamsCentre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Emma McIntoshHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Frank KeeUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI)/Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Funding

Department of Health PHR/12/211/82Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing physical activity in the workplace can provide employee physical and mental health benefits, and employer economic benefits through reduced absenteeism and increased productivity. The workplace is an opportune setting to encourage habitual activity. However, there is limited evidence on effective behaviour change interventions that lead to maintained physical activity. This study aims to address this gap and help build the necessary evidence base for effective, and cost-effective, workplace interventions. METHODS/

designThis cluster randomised control trial will recruit 776 office-based employees from public sector organisations in Belfast and Lisburn city centres, Northern Ireland. Participants will be randomly allocated by cluster to either the Intervention Group or Control Group (waiting list control). The 6-month intervention consists of rewards (retail vouchers, based on similar principles to high street loyalty cards), feedback and other evidence-based behaviour change techniques. Sensors situated in the vicinity of participating workplaces will promote and monitor minutes of physical activity undertaken by participants. Both groups will complete all outcome measures. The primary outcome is steps per day recorded using a pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker CW-701) for 7 consecutive days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcomes include health, mental wellbeing, quality of life, work absenteeism and presenteeism, and use of healthcare resources. Process measures will assess intervention "dose", website usage, and intervention fidelity. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the National Health Service, employer and retailer perspective using both a cost-utility and cost-effectiveness framework. The inclusion of a discrete choice experiment will further generate values for a cost-benefit analysis. Participant focus groups will explore who the intervention worked for and why, and interviews with retailers will elucidate their views on the sustainability of a public health focused loyalty card scheme. DISCUSSION: The study is designed to maximise the potential for roll-out in similar settings, by engaging the public sector and business community in designing and delivering the intervention. We have developed a sustainable business model using a 'points' based loyalty platform, whereby local businesses 'sponsor' the incentive (retail vouchers) in return for increased footfall to their business.

trial registrationISRCTN17975376 (Registered 19/09/2014).

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorMotivationAdultCitiesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNorthern IrelandObesityQuality of LifeResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioural economicsBehaviour change maintenanceCluster RCTEconomic evaluationFinancial incentivesInterventionMediation analysesPhysical activityWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID27448663
PMCPMC4957294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.