ArticleBMC medical ethics2016
Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endocrine Management of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adolescents: Expert Opinion of the ESPE Working Group on Gender Incongruence and the Endo-ERN Main Thematic Group on Sexual Development and Maturation.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Guideline
- Conduct and counter-conduct in everyday patient encounters: a foucauldian interpretation of nurses' lived experiences in forensic psychiatric inpatient care.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Navigating Ethical Challenges in CAR-T Treatment.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Development and pilot validation of a European ethical framework for decision-making in dementia care.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Carrying the Facilitator Responsibility: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Under Training to Become Facilitators of Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Paediatric Oncology.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Hidden Dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- The Japanese version of the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD 2.0): Validation and score distribution among nurses, doctors, and other healthcare providers-A cross-sectional study.Global health & medicine · 2026Article
- Ethical Expertise Before and After Medically Assisted Dying: The Informal and Formal Role of the Ethicist in the Netherlands.Bioethics · 2026Article
- Age and grit in prioritising intensive care: - a mixed-methods approach of normative challenges.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Positioning Ethics When Direct Patient Care is Prioritized: Experiences from Implementing Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Childhood Cancer Care.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025Article
- Moral injury, moral resilience, and organizational effectiveness among nurse leaders: a descriptive analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Fostering moral reflectivity in community pharmacists through moral case deliberation using the dilemma method.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Complex Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Discussion Paper and Suggested Model.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Ethical and Communicative Challenges in Informing Patients with Delusional Infestation: Insights from Moral Case Deliberation.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a competency-based coordinator of advance care planning competency enhancement program: a mixed method.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating impact of consulting midwives on maternal rights charter on perception of respectful maternity care and postpartum blues among postpartum women: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators' Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024Article
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion on Editorial Boards of Medical Student Journals.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMoral Case Deliberation is a specific form of bioethics education fostering professionals' moral competence in order to deal with their moral questions. So far, few studies focus in detail on Moral Case Deliberation methodologies and their didactic principles. The dilemma method is a structured and frequently used method in Moral Case Deliberation that stimulates methodological reflection and reasoning through a systematic dialogue on an ethical issue experienced in practice.
methodsIn this paper we present a case-study of a Moral Case Deliberation with the dilemma method in a health care institution for people with an intellectual disability, describing the theoretical background and the practical application of the dilemma method. The dilemma method focuses on moral experiences of participants concerning a concrete dilemma in practice. By an in-depth description of each of the steps of the deliberation process, we elucidate the educational value and didactics of this specific method.
resultsThe didactics and methodical steps of the dilemma method both supported and structured the dialogical reflection process of the participants. The process shows that the participants learned to recognize the moral dimension of the issue at stake and were able to distinguish various perspectives and reasons in a systematic manner. The facilitator played an important role in the learning process of the participants, by assisting them in focusing on and exploring moral aspects of the case. DISCUSSION: The reflection and learning process, experienced by the participants, shows competency-based characteristics. The role of the facilitator is that of a Socratic teacher with specific knowledge and skills, fostering reflection, inquiry and dialogue.
conclusionThe specific didactics of the dilemma method is well suited for teaching bioethics in clinical settings. The dilemma method follows an inductive learning approach through a dialogical moral inquiry in which participants develop not only knowledge but also skills, attitude and character. The role of a trained facilitator and a specific view on teaching and practicing ethics are essential when using the dilemma method in teaching health care professionals how to reflect on their own moral issues in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.