Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448418›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2016

Minimizing Interrater Variability in Staging Sleep by Use of Computer-Derived Features.

Magdy Younes, Patrick J Hanly

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automatic analysis of single-channel sleep EEG in a large spectrum of sleep disorders.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: background and implications for clinicians.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Reliability of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Rules for Assessing Sleep Depth in Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Accuracy, Night-to-Night Variability, and Stability of Frontopolar Sleep Electroencephalography Biomarkers.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdy YounesYRT Ltd, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Patrick J HanlySleep Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Foothills Medical Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesInter-scorer variability in sleep staging of polysomnograms (PSGs) results primarily from difficulty in determining whether: (1) an electroencephalogram pattern of wakefulness spans > 15 sec in transitional epochs, (2) spindles or K complexes are present, and (3) duration of delta waves exceeds 6 sec in a 30-sec epoch. We hypothesized that providing digitally derived information about these variables to PSG scorers may reduce inter-scorer variability.

methodsFifty-six PSGs were scored (five-stage) by two experienced technologists, (first manual, M1). Months later, the technologists edited their own scoring (second manual, M2). PSGs were then scored with an automatic system and the same two technologists and an additional experienced technologist edited them, epoch-by-epoch (Edited-Auto). This resulted in seven manual scores for each PSG. The two M2 scores were then independently modified using digitally obtained values for sleep depth and delta duration and digitally identified spindles and K complexes.

resultsPercent agreement between scorers in M2 was 78.9 ± 9.0% before modification and 96.5 ± 2.6% after. Errors of this approach were defined as a change in a manual score to a stage that was not assigned by any scorer during the seven manual scoring sessions. Total errors averaged 7.1 ± 3.7% and 6.9 ± 3.8% of epochs for scorers 1 and 2, respectively, and there was excellent agreement between the modified score and the initial manual score of each technologist.

conclusionsProviding digitally obtained information about sleep depth, delta duration, spindles and K complexes during manual scoring can greatly reduce interrater variability in sleep staging by eliminating the guesswork in scoring epochs with equivocal features.

Indexed as

Observer VariationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyReproducibility of ResultsSleep Stagesautomated scoringinterobserver variabilityPSGsleep stages

Identifiers

PMID27448418
PMCPMC5033736
OpenAlexW2511336605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.