Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448213›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016

The assessment of non culprit coronary artery lesions in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease by control angiography with quantitative coronary angiography.

Esra Dönmez, Mevlüt Koç, Taner Şeker, Yahya Kemal İçen, Murat Çayli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  5. Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esra DönmezAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey. dresradonmez@yahoo.com.
Mevlüt KoçAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Taner ŞekerAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Yahya Kemal İçenAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Murat ÇayliAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Serinevler Mah., Ege Bağatur Bulvarı Üzeri, Yüreğir, 01240, Adana, Turkey.
Adana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicting data is present in the literature about patients who are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to the exaggeration of the non culprit artery. The precise understanding of the non culprit artery in the setting of ST segment elevated myocardial infarct (STEMI) is important since the time and modality of the treatment is planned accordingly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the lesions in the non culprit coronary artery during primary PCI and control coronary angiography (CAG) using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in multivessel STEMI patients. In this study, multivessel disease STEMI patients whom underwent primary PCI between January 2010 and March 2011 were included. Critical stenosis degree was accepted as ≥70 % in the non culprit artery. All patients were evaluated with control CAG 1 month after primary PCI. Assessment with CAG was performed by two blinded cardiologists. QCA program was used to evaluate reference artery diameter (RAD), minimum luminal diameter (MLD) and degree of stenosis. With regard to the degree of stenosis, significant reduction was accepted as ≥15 % while % 5-15 decrease was accepted as moderate. Of the 81 patients, 61 were males and 20 were females (mean age 58.1 ± 10). In the control CAG, the degree of non culprit artery stenosis was found to be decreased (p < 0.001) while RAD and MLD were increased (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Significant decrease in critical non culprit artery lesions was detected in 22 patients (20.9 %) meanwhile moderate reduction was observed in 26 patients (24.7 %). In 14 patients (13.3 %), non culprit artery lesions accepted as critical during primary PCI were found to be non critical during the control CAG. Planned intervention was cancelled and medical treatment was initiated in those 14 patients. Our data indicated using QCA, approximately the half of non culprit lesions were found less critical during control CAG when compared to primary PCI. Therefore, it is concluded that complete revascularization during primary PCI should be avoided in multivessel STEMI patients and critical non culprit artery lesions should be re-evaluated with later control CAG.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeNon culprit arteryPrimary PCIQuantitative coronary angiography

Identifiers

PMID27448213
OpenAlexW2479430180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.