ArticlePloS one2016
Tracking the Antigenic Evolution of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The molecular basis of antigenic variation among A(H9N2) avian influenza viruses.Emerging microbes & infections · 2018Pooled it
- Performance of prototype serological immunoassays for foot-and-mouth disease virus using G-H loop peptides and stabilized virus-like particles.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay for detection of VP1 of foot and mouth disease virus serotype O.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-like Particles Produced inVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- An antigen panel to assess the regional relevance of foot and mouth disease vaccines.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Single-Domain Antibodies That Specifically Recognize Intact Capsids of Multiple Foot-and-Mouth Disease Serotype O Strains.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity and antigenic variability of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains in Egypt.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Mapping cross-reactive residues in the G-H loop of foot-and-mouth disease virus: insights for serotype-specific design.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A broadly reactive ultralong bovine antibody that can determine the integrity of foot-and-mouth disease virus capsids.The Journal of general virology · 2024Article
- Identification of Conserved Linear Epitopes on Viral Protein 2 of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype O by Monoclonal Antibodies 6F4.D11.B6 and 8D6.B9.C3.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- B and T Cell Epitopes of the Incursionary Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype SAT2 for Vaccine Development.Viruses · 2023Review
- Pathological and genetic characterization of foot and mouth disease viruses collected from cattle and water buffalo in Egypt.PloS one · 2023Article
- Diversity of SAT2 foot-and-mouth disease virus in Sudan: implication for diagnosis and control.Veterinary research communications · 2022Article
- Cross-Serotype Reactivity of ELISAs Used to Detect Antibodies to the Structural Proteins of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.Viruses · 2022Article
- Molecular detection, phylogenetic analysis and genetic diversity of recently isolated foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A African topotype, Genotype IV.Virology journal · 2022Article
- Molecular Basis of Antigenic Drift in Serotype O Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viruses (2013-2018) from Southeast Asia.Viruses · 2021Article
- Article
- Genetic determinants of receptor-binding preference and zoonotic potential of H9N2 avian influenza viruses.Journal of virology · 2021Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Immunological Response against Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Infection and Its Evasion Mechanisms.Vaccines · 2020Review
- Targeted Modification of the Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus Genome for Quick Cell Culture Adaptation.Vaccines · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying and predicting the antigenic characteristics of a virus is something of a holy grail for infectious disease research because of its central importance to the emergence of new strains, the severity of outbreaks, and vaccine selection. However, these characteristics are defined by a complex interplay of viral and host factors so that phylogenetic measures of viral similarity are often poorly correlated to antigenic relationships. Here, we generate antigenic phylogenies that track the phenotypic evolution of two serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus by combining host serology and viral sequence data to identify sites that are critical to their antigenic evolution. For serotype SAT1, we validate our antigenic phylogeny against monoclonal antibody escape mutants, which match all of the predicted antigenic sites. For serotype O, we validate it against known sites where available, and otherwise directly evaluate the impact on antigenic phenotype of substitutions in predicted sites using reverse genetics and serology. We also highlight a critical and poorly understood problem for vaccine selection by revealing qualitative differences between assays that are often used interchangeably to determine antigenic match between field viruses and vaccine strains. Our approach provides a tool to identify naturally occurring antigenic substitutions, allowing us to track the genetic diversification and associated antigenic evolution of the virus. Despite the hugely important role vaccines have played in enhancing human and animal health, vaccinology remains a conspicuously empirical science. This study advances the field by providing guidance for tuning vaccine strains via site-directed mutagenesis through this high-resolution tracking of antigenic evolution of the virus between rare major shifts in phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.