Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27448105›Full record

ReviewInfection2017

Bacterial coinfections in dengue virus disease: what we know and what is still obscure about an emerging concern.

Mattia Trunfio, Alessia Savoldi, Ottavia Viganò, Antonella d'Arminio Monforte

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Zika immune imprint risks dengue.Nature immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. False-positive dengue non-structural protein 1 in pregnancy.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Oral Candidiasis in Acute Flaviviral Infection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Severe dengue in the intensive care unit.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mattia TrunfioDepartment of Medical Sciences, Universitary Clinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, University of Torino, Corso Svizzera 164, 10149, Torino, Italy. mattia.trunfio@edu.unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-719X
Alessia SavoldiDepartment of Health Sciences, Universitary Clinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milano, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Ottavia ViganòDepartment of Health Sciences, Universitary Clinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milano, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Antonella d'Arminio MonforteDepartment of Health Sciences, Universitary Clinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milano, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITOspedale Amedeo di Savoia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDengue virus is the most frequent arthropod-borne viral infection worldwide. Simultaneously to the growth of its incidence, cases of bacterial coinfection in dengue have been increasingly reported. The clinical course of dual infections may worsen for reciprocal interactions and delays in the diagnosis, so that clinicians should be aware of this eventuality. Therefore, we reviewed literature to provide an overview of the epidemiological, clinical, and physiopathological issues related to bacterial coinfections and bacteremia in dengue.

methodsClinical studies and case reports regarding bacteremia and bacterial coinfections in dengue and the interactions between the pathogens published on PubMed were reviewed.

resultsWe found 26 case reports, only 3 studies on concurrent bacteremia and 12 studies reporting data on bacterial coinfections in dengue. According to the three available studies, the 0.18-7 % of dengue infections are accompanied by concurrent bacteremia, while the 14.3-44.4 % of dengue-related deaths seem associated to bacterial coinfections. Comorbidities, advanced age, and more severe dengue manifestations could be risk factors for dual infections. A longer duration of fever and alterations in laboratory parameters such as procalcitonin, hyponatremia, leukocyte count, and renal function tests can raise the suspicion.

conclusionsDespite the real burden and consequences of this emerging concern is still not computable accurately due to the lack of a significant number of studies on large cohorts, clinicians need a greater awareness about it to early recognize warning signs, to properly use available diagnostic tools and to readily start antibiotic treatment able to prevent worsening in mortality and morbidity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacteremiaCoinfectionDengueFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBacteremiaBacteriaCoinfectionDengueInnate immunityPathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID27448105
OpenAlexW2504671095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.