Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447940›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2016

Alcohol-induced place conditioning in moderate social drinkers.

Emma Childs, Harriet de Wit

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. VR for Studying the Neuroscience of Emotional Responses.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma ChildsDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Acquisition and persistence of drug cue conditioning in humans - Resubmission 01R01DA037011 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Role of environmental conditioning in responses to alcohol in humansR21AA020964 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHILDS, EMMA · 2012 to 2013
$397k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo test whether non-dependent drinkers show place preference for a location paired with alcohol, and to test if the amount of time spent in the alcohol-paired location is related to self-reported subjective alcohol effects experienced in that environment.

designTwo groups of subjects completed six conditioning sessions: three with alcohol (0.8 g/kg) and three without alcohol. Individuals were assigned randomly to two groups, paired and unpaired, in a 2 : 1 ratio. The paired group (n = 78) received alcohol in one testing room and no-alcohol in another testing room (biased assignment). The unpaired group (n = 30) received alcohol and no-alcohol in each testing room.

settingHuman Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (single site).

participantsHealthy male and female social drinkers (n = 108) aged 21-40 years participated in the study (consisting of 10 separate laboratory visits) between March 2012 and August 2014 (an average of 36 separate subject visits per month). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the pre- to post-conditioning change in the percentage of time spent in the least preferred room (obtained during drug-free exploration tests conducted at separate visits before and after the six conditioning sessions were completed). Secondary measures included self-reported subjective mood and drug effects obtained during the conditioning sessions.

findingsThe groups differed in the change in the percentage of time spent in the initially least preferred room, from pre- to post-conditioning; paired group = 11.0%, unpaired group = -1.4%, mean difference = 12.4%, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-23.0, P = 0.02. The change in the percentage of time spent in the least-preferred room was related to the self-reported sedative effects of alcohol during conditioning sessions among paired group participants only.

conclusionsNon-dependent consumers of alcohol appear to develop a behavioral preference for locations paired with alcohol consumption, more so for those who experience sedative effects from alcohol in those locations.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionSelf ReportYoung AdultAlcoholbehaviorconditioned place preferencesedationsocial drinkerssubjective effects

Identifiers

PMID27447940
PMCPMC5226878
OpenAlexW2506940441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.