Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447822›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Past Actions as Self-Signals: How Acting in a Self-Interested Way Influences Environmental Decision Making.

Chang-Yuan Lee, Guy Hochman, Steven E Prince, Dan Ariely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Forgoing earned incentives to signal pure motives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chang-Yuan LeeCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United State of America.
Guy HochmanSchool of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel.
Steven E PrinceCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United State of America.
Dan ArielyCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United State of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, awareness of environmental issues has increased significantly. Little has changed, however, in human activities contributing to environmental damage. Why is it so difficult for us to change our behavior in a domain that is clearly so important to the future of humanity? Here we propose and test the possibility that self-signaling, the way we view ourselves based on our past behaviors, is one of the factors contributing to the difficulty of taking environmental action. In three experiments, we show that previous self-interested thoughts or behaviors serve as important signals that hinder the likelihood of acting in line with an individual's reported concern for the environment. This study not only helps explain the gap between environmental awareness and action, but also suggests alternative strategies for policymakers and environmental agencies to promote proenvironmental behavior.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDecision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSelf ConceptAdultAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSocial BehaviorSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27447822
PMCPMC4957805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.