Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447788›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study.

Jonathan Dugernier, Gregory Reychler, Xavier Wittebole, Jean Roeseler, Virginie Depoortere, Thierry Sottiaux, Jean-Bernard Michotte, Rita Vanbever, Thierry Dugernier, Pierre Goffette and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01879488 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Ventilation Mode on Lung Deposition of a Radiolabeled Aerosol During Mechanical Ventilation: Barometric Versus Volumetric

TypeinterventionalSponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de LouvainRan2013 to 2015Enrolled19ConditionsPost-operative NeurosurgeryArmstechnetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Vibrating-mesh nebulizer, Gamma scintigraphy, Preoperative spirometry
NCT03597334 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Aerosol Therapy in Intensive Care Units: a Prospective Observation Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorlvshanRan2018 to 2018Enrolled1,095ConditionsRespiration, Artificial, Critical CareArmsaerosol therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nebuliser therapy in critical care: The past, present and future.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring pulmonary distribution of intratracheally instilled liquid foams in excised porcine lungs.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. AnFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan DugernierSoins Intensifs, Médecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. Jonathan.dugernier@uclouvain.be.
Gregory ReychlerMédecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier WitteboleSoins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean RoeselerSoins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Virginie DepoortereMédecine Nucléaire, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry SottiauxSoins Intensifs, Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce, Chaussée de Nivelles 212, Gosselies, Belgium.
Jean-Bernard MichotteHaute Ecole de Santé Vaud, Filière physiothérapie, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Beaumont 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rita VanbeverLouvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry DugernierSoins Intensifs, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Avenue Reine Fabiola 9, 1340, Ottignies, Belgium.
Pierre GoffetteRadiologie Interventionnelle, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Agnes DocquierAnesthésiologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Christian RaftopoulosNeurochirurgie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe HantsonSoins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
François JamarMédecine Nucléaire, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre-François LaterreSoins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUCLouvain · BEClinique Saint Pierre · BEHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation.

methodsSeventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy.

resultsLung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung.

conclusionsIn the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488.

Indexed as

Aerosol deliveryInvasive mechanical ventilationVentilation modeVibrating-mesh nebulizer

Identifiers

PMID27447788
PMCPMC4958090
OpenAlexW2486705520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.