Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447464›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2016

Partially loaded plain radiographic measurement to evaluate rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

William Pedraza, Johannes Beckmann, Constantin Mayer, Frieder Mauch, Jochen Huth, Raymond Best

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William PedrazaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Johannes BeckmannDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Constantin MayerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Frieder MauchDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jochen HuthDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Raymond BestDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstraße 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany. Raymond.Best@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Klinikum Stuttgart · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRotational alignment of prosthetic components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is predominantly monitored with computer tomography (CT), for example by relating the anatomical transepicondylar axis (a-TEA) of the native femur to the posterior bicondylar axis of the prosthetic component (PBCA). The purpose of the present study was to portray a reliable, novel plain radiographic method that likewise enables the evaluation of rotational positioning of prosthetic components in TKA. Furthermore, it was intended to evaluate the prosthetic femoro-tibial functional behavior under loaded conditions.

methodsModified plain axial radiographs under partial weight bearing (20 kg) were performed in 63 patients (63 knees) after TKA. On the obtained radiographs, all established, relevant anatomic, and prosthetic axis and angles reflecting the rotational position of the femoral (i.e., a-TEA/PBCA angle) and tibial component were detected twice by two independent examiners with an interval of one month. Additionally, in 14 cases with anterior knee pain after surgery, radiographic results were compared to obtained computer tomography images; intraclass coefficients (ICC's) for intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated.

resultsAll pre-assigned axis and angles could be identified doubtlessly by both examiners in all investigated knees. For all measurements, ICC's for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. The comparison of the radiographic measurements with corresponding CT results (n = 14) revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Rotational alignment of the tibial tray in relation to the native tibial bone was not measurable due to display overlaying. Femoro-tibial behaviour of the prosthetic components under partial loading showed a high variability.

conclusionWe were able to establish a new reliable radiographic technique that is able to show the most established and relevant anatomic landmarks and prosthetic axis after TKA to assess the rotational alignment of the prosthetic components in TKA in relation to the distal femur. The evaluation of the femoro-tibal behaviour instead shows a high variability and so far does not allow valid explanatory conclusions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFemurHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatient PositioningReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTibiaFemoral roll backKnee arthroplastyKnee kinematicsRadiographic measurementRotational alignment

Identifiers

PMID27447464
OpenAlexW2503503707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.