Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447365›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of neurology2016

Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Catherine E Lang, Michael J Strube, Marghuretta D Bland, Kimberly J Waddell, Kendra M Cherry-Allen, Randolph J Nudo, Alexander W Dromerick, Rebecca L Birkenmeier

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05013762 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Fast Training Promotes Recovery of Arm Movements Post-stroke Via Cerebellar-mediated Anticipatory Feedforward Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsCerebrovascular StrokeArmsFast intervention, Active Monitoring
NCT05248178 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Testing of tDCS and Metacognitive Strategy Training in Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled11ConditionsChronic StrokeArmsCO-OP Procedures, tDCS, Computer Cognitive Training Procedures, sham tDCS group
NCT06806553 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with Motor Relearning Program (MRP) and Bobath Approach to Augment Functional Motor Recovery of Chronic Hemiparetic Arm

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled64ConditionsStroke, Hemiparesis, Hemiparesis After Stroke, Motor FunctionArmsConstraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) With Motor Relearning Program (MRP), Bobath Therapy
NCT06933147 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Resistance Training and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2024 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsStrokeArmsConstraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), Resistance Training (RT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine E LangProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. langc@wustl.edu.
Michael J StrubeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Marghuretta D BlandProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Kimberly J WaddellProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Kendra M Cherry-AllenProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Randolph J NudoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Alexander W DromerickDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC.
Rebecca L BirkenmeierProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · USMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Translation of in-clinic Gains to Gains in Daily Life After StrokeR01HD068290 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LANG, CATHERINE · 2012 to 2021
$4.0M
Translation of In-Clinic Gains to Gains in Daily LifeR37HD068290 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine Lang · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068290NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD068290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objectives of this work were to (1) determine whether higher doses of motor therapy in chronic poststroke hemiparesis result in better outcomes, compared to lower doses, and (2) evaluate potential modifiers of the dose-response relationship.

methodsEighty-five adults with upper extremity paresis ≥6 months poststroke were randomized to one of four dose groups in this single-blind, parallel, randomized, control trial. The dosing parameter manipulated was amount of task-specific training, as indexed by the number of task repetitions. Groups received 3,200, 6,400, 9,600, or individualized maximum (IM) repetitions, during 1-hour sessions, 4 days/week for 8 weeks. The intervention was an individualized, progressive, task-specific upper-limb training program designed to improve upper-limb functional motor capacity. The primary outcome was the slope of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) during the intervention. Effects of dose and potential modifiers of the dose-response relationship were evaluated with hierarchical linear models.

resultsARAT scores for the 3,200, 9,600, and IM groups improved over time as indicated by slopes (ΔARAT/week, mean ± standard errors) of 0.40 ± 0.15, 0.31 ± 0.16, and 0.66 ± 0.14, respectively (p < 0.05). The slope of the 6,400 group was smaller (-0.05 ± 0.15) and significantly different from the 3,200 and IM groups (p < 0.001). Initial motor capacity, neglect, and other tested characteristics did not modify the dose-response relationship.

interpretationOverall, treatment effects were small. There was no evidence of a dose-response effect of task-specific training on functional capacity in people with long-standing upper-limb paresis poststroke. Ann Neurol 2016;80:342-354.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAgedExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParesisSingle-Blind MethodStrokeStroke RehabilitationTime FactorsUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID27447365
PMCPMC5016233
OpenAlexW2482960386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.