ArticleCancer2016
Long-term trajectories of self-reported cognitive function in a cohort of older survivors of breast cancer: CALGB 369901 (Alliance).
Article in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of frailty with symptoms, and HRQOL in older cancer survivors after cancer treatments: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- The prevalence of frailty among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of cognitive sequelae of non-central nervous system cancer and cancer therapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review of self-reported cognitive function in cancer patients following chemotherapy treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018Pooled it
- Improving preoperative breast reconstruction consultations: a qualitative study on the impact of personalised audio-recordings.BMC women's health · 2021Trial
- Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Long-term health-related quality of life among adolescent and young adult breast cancer survivors.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Digital Rehabilitation Program for Breast Cancer Survivors on Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy: A Feasibility Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- "It Was a Downward Spiral": A Qualitative Study of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Experiences with Cognitive and Mental Health.Cancers · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for frailty in breast cancer patients with extended survival.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Relationship of physical activity and cognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
- Modifying modularity: aerobic exercise improves functional connectivity in breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
- Long-term changes of cognitive impairment among older breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Deficit Accumulation Index and Biological Markers of Aging in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- How frail is frail in oncology studies? A scoping review.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Education, incident cancer, and rate of memory decline in a national sample of US adults in mid-to-later-life.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review on the Potential Acceleration of Neurocognitive Aging in Older Cancer Survivors.Cancers · 2023Review
- Premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in young adult survivors of pediatric cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe number of survivors of breast cancer aged ≥65 years ("older") is growing, but to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the cognitive outcomes of these individuals.
methodsA cohort of cognitively intact older survivors with nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer was recruited from 78 sites from 2004 through 2011; approximately 83.7% of the survivors (1280 survivors) completed baseline assessments. Follow-up data were collected at 6 months and annually for up to 7 years (median, 4.1 years). Cognitive function was self-reported using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30); scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better function. Group-based trajectory modeling determined trajectories; women were assigned to a trajectory group based on the highest predicted probability of membership. Multinomial logistic regression evaluated the association between receipt of chemotherapy (with or without hormonal treatment) and trajectory group.
resultsSurvivors were aged 65 to 91 years; approximately 41% received chemotherapy. There were 3 cognitive trajectories: "maintained high" (42.3% of survivors); "phase shift" (50.1% of survivors), with scores slightly below but parallel to maintained high; and "accelerated decline" (7.6% of survivors), with the lowest baseline scores and greatest decline (from 71.7 [standard deviation, 19.8] to 58.3 [standard deviation, 21.9]). The adjusted odds of being in the accelerated decline group (vs the maintained high group) were 2.1 times higher (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.5) for survivors who received chemotherapy (with or without hormonal therapy) versus those treated with hormonal therapy alone. Greater comorbidity and frailty also were found to be associated with accelerated decline.
conclusionsTrajectory group analysis demonstrated that the majority of older survivors maintained good long-term self-reported cognitive function, and that only a small subset who were exposed to chemotherapy manifested accelerated cognitive decline. Future research is needed to determine factors that place some older survivors at risk of experiencing cognitive decline. Cancer 2016;122:3555-3563. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.