Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27447117›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019

Rod-cone crossover connectome of mammalian bipolar cells.

J Scott Lauritzen, Crystal L Sigulinsky, James R Anderson, Michael Kalloniatis, Noah T Nelson, Daniel P Emrich, Christopher Rapp, Nicholas McCarthy, Ethan Kerzner, Miriah Meyer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retinal Pathoconnectomics: A Window into Neurodegeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Network Architecture of Gap Junctional Coupling among Parallel Processing Channels in the Mammalian Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Graffinity: Visualizing Connectivity in Large Graphs.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J Scott LauritzenHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Crystal L SigulinskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
James R AndersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Michael KalloniatisDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science and Centre for Eye Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Noah T NelsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Daniel P EmrichDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christopher RappDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nicholas McCarthyDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Ethan KerznerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah School of Computing, Salt Lake City Utah, USA.
Miriah MeyerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah School of Computing, Salt Lake City Utah, USA.
Bryan W JonesDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Robert E MarcDepartment of Ophthalmology, John A. Moran Vision Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USJanelia Research Campus · USVision Eye Institute · AU

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAUL STEVEN BERNSTEIN · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
STRUCTURAL NEUROCHEMISTRY OF RETINAL CIRCUITSR01EY002576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MARC, ROBERT E · 1985 to 2016
$8.0M
Retinal RemodelingR01EY015128 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JONES, BRYAN WILLIAM · 2004 to 2021
$7.0M
Retinal CircuitryR01EY028927 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Bryan William Jones · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
Vision Research Training Grant at the University of UtahT32EY024234 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DAVID KRIZAJ, Monica L Vetter · 2014 to 2026
$2.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015128NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028927NEI NIH HHS T32 EY024234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basis of cross-suppression between rod and cone channels has long been an enigma. Using rabbit retinal connectome RC1, we show that all cone bipolar cell (BC) classes inhibit rod BCs via amacrine cell (AC) motifs (C1-6); that all cone BC classes are themselves inhibited by AC motifs (R1-5, R25) driven by rod BCs. A sparse symmetric AC motif (CR) is presynaptic and postsynaptic to both rod and cone BCs. ON cone BCs of all classes drive inhibition of rod BCs via motif C1 wide-field GABAergic ACs (γACs) and motif C2 narrow field glycinergic ON ACs (GACs). Each rod BC receives ≈10 crossover AC synapses and each ON cone BC can target ≈10 or more rod BCs via separate AC processes. OFF cone BCs mediate monosynaptic inhibition of rod BCs via motif C3 driven by OFF γACs and GACs and disynaptic inhibition via motifs C4 and C5 driven by OFF wide-field γACs and narrow-field GACs, respectively. Motifs C4 and C5 form halos of 60-100 inhibitory synapses on proximal dendrites of AI γACs. Rod BCs inhibit surrounding arrays of cone BCs through AII GAC networks that access ON and OFF cone BC patches via motifs R1, R2, R4, R5 and a unique ON AC motif R3 that collects rod BC inputs and targets ON cone BCs. Crossover synapses for motifs C1, C4, C5, and R3 are 3-4× larger than typical feedback synapses, which may be a signature for synaptic winner-take-all switches. J. Comp. Neurol. 527:87-116, 2019. © 2016 The Authors The Journal of Comparative Neurology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAmacrine CellsAnimalsNeural PathwaysRabbitsRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor Cellsamacrine cellscone visionconnectomicsnetworksretinarod visionRRID AB_2341093RRID AB_2532053RRID AB_2532055RRID AB_2532057RRID AB_2532059RRID AB_2532060RRID AB_2532061RRID SCR_001622RRID SCR-002937RRID SCR_005986RRID SCR_008394RRID SCR-008606synapsestransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID27447117
PMCPMC5823792
OpenAlexW2503995871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.