Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446980›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2015

A Chemical Genetic Screening Procedure for

Marta Bjornson, Xingshun Song, Abhaya Dandekar, Annaliese Franz, Georgia Drakakaki, Katayoon Dehesh

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta BjornsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA.
Xingshun SongCollege of Life Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Abhaya DandekarDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA.
Annaliese FranzDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, USA.
Georgia DrakakakiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA.
Katayoon DeheshDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA.
Plant (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · USNortheast Forestry University · CN

Funding

Defining the Retrograde Plastid-to-Nucleus Stress Signaling PathwayR01GM107311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI DEHESH, KATAYOON · 2013 to 2021
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unbiased screening approaches are powerful tools enabling identification of novel players in biological processes. Chemical genetic screening refers to the technique of using a reporter response, such as expression of luciferase driven by a promoter of interest, to discover small molecules that affect a given process when applied to plants. These chemicals then act as tools for identification of regulatory components that could not otherwise be detected by forward genetic screens due to gene family redundancy or mutant lethality. This protocol describes a chemical genetic screen using

Identifiers

PMID27446980
PMCPMC4950980
OpenAlexW2511535834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.