Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446970›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2016

MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection.

Alan W Preece, Ian Craddock, Mike Shere, Lyn Jones, Helen L Winton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03302819 (Performance Evaluation of the MARIA), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03302819 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Performance Evaluation of the MARIA (Multi Static Array Processing of Radiowave Image Acquisition) Radar Breast Imaging System in Patients With Breast Cancer and in Patients Assessed in the Symptomatic Breast Clinic.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2018Enrolled994ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMARIA scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microwave and Antenna Systems in Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Near-Field Microwave Scattering Formulation by A Deep Learning Method.IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alan W PreeceBristol University , School of Clinical Sciences, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, United Kingdom.
Ian CraddockBristol University , School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UB, United Kingdom.
Mike ShereNorth Bristol NHS Trust , Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
Lyn JonesNorth Bristol NHS Trust , Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
Helen L WintonMicrima Limited , The Engine Shed, Station Approach, Bristol BS1 6QH, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A microwave imaging system has been developed as a clinical diagnostic tool operating in the 3- to 8-GHz region using multistatic data collection. A total of 86 patients recruited from a symptomatic breast care clinic were scanned with a prototype design. The resultant three-dimensional images have been compared "blind" with available ultrasound and mammogram images to determine the detection rate. Images show the location of the strongest signal, and this corresponded in both older and younger women, with sensitivity of [Formula: see text], which was found to be maintained in dense breasts. The pathway from clinical prototype to clinical evaluation is outlined.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinical evaluationimagingMARIAmultistatic radarultrawideband

Identifiers

PMID27446970
PMCPMC4951628
OpenAlexW2489287816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.